Piston-Controlled Sleeve Ports for Internal Combustion Engine Gas Distribution

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current four-stroke piston internal combustion engines face limitations due to small intake and exhaust valve flow areas, leading to reduced engine performance, high thermal stress, incomplete scavenging, and inefficient gas exchange, particularly at high loads and low engine speeds.

Innovation Solution

The proposed method enhances gas distribution by using piston-controlled ports in the cylinder sleeve, allowing exhaust gases to flow through both the exhaust valve and ports during the power stroke and using these ports to reintroduce hot exhaust gases into the cylinder during the intake stroke, especially at low loads, thereby increasing scavenging efficiency and reducing thermal stress.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If small flow area of intake and exhaust valves is used, then device complexity is reduced, but gas exchange quality and speed are limited, reducing engine performance

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevalve structure simplicityVSAvoidengine performance
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The exhaust gas flow path is segmented into two channels: one through the exhaust valve and another through dedicated ports in the cylinder sleeve. This segmentation allows simultaneous maintenance of simple valve structure and achievement of high gas exchange capacity through the additional port pathway.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The ports in the cylinder sleeve serve multiple functions: they act as exhaust outlets during the power stroke and as intake pathways during the intake stroke for exhaust gas recirculation. This multi-functionality enables improved gas exchange without adding complex separate systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Device complexity

If small scavenging is used, then device complexity is reduced, but thermal stress on exhaust system details increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegas distribution mechanism simplicityVSAvoidthermal stress on exhaust valve
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSStress or pressure

Solution Approach 1:

The exhaust gas flow is divided between the exhaust valve and separate ports in the cylinder sleeve. This segmentation reduces the thermal burden on the exhaust valve by providing an alternative escape path, thereby reducing thermal stress while maintaining a relatively simple gas distribution mechanism.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Device complexity

If small scavenging is used, then device complexity is reduced, but maximum combustion pressure increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegas distribution mechanism simplicityVSAvoidmaximum combustion pressure
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSStress or pressure

Solution Approach 1:

By segmenting the gas exchange pathways to include both exhaust valve and sleeve ports, the system achieves better scavenging that controls combustion pressure without requiring complex additional mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The ports are timed to open during specific strokes (exhaust during power stroke, intake during intake stroke), creating periodic action that optimizes gas flow timing. This periodic operation improves scavenging efficiency and combustion pressure control while maintaining simple mechanism design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

4Device complexity

If exhaust gas recirculation is not implemented, then device complexity is reduced, but starting characteristics and efficiency at low loads deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegas distribution system simplicityVSAvoidstarting characteristics
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The ports in the cylinder sleeve are designed to serve dual purposes: exhaust outlets during the power stroke and recirculation pathways during the intake stroke. This multi-functionality enables exhaust gas recirculation to improve starting characteristics and low-load efficiency without adding separate complex recirculation systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The ports operate periodically with different functions depending on the engine stroke: exhausting gases during the power stroke and allowing exhaust gas recirculation during the intake stroke. This periodic multi-functionality achieves improved reliability at low loads while maintaining simple system design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This method improves engine performance by increasing boost pressure, reducing thermal stress, and enhancing scavenging, leading to increased efficiency, reduced maximum combustion pressure, and lower risk of detonation, while also improving starting characteristics and ecological performance.

Implementation Method 1

exhaust gases to flow through both the exhaust valve and ports during the power stroke

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPressure differential: Pressure Gradient

Implementation Method 2

using these ports to reintroduce hot exhaust gases into the cylinder during the intake stroke

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPressure differential: Pressure Gradient

Data Source

PatentUS10247091B2Method of gas distribution of internal combustion engine
Publication Date: 2019.04.02 ZHMUDYAK ALEXANDRA LEONIDOVNA
  • US10247091B2 patent drawing
  • US10247091B2 patent drawing
  • US10247091B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An air, entering into the cylinder of the piston internal combustion engine (PICE) via intake valve (or coming both: through intake valve and through intake ports in the sleeve), flows out through the exhaust ports in the sleeve at the end of the intake stroke and/or at the beginning of the compression stroke. Thus increase (compared with the conventional—“PICE”) scavenging through the cylinder at full engine loads.In idle running, at low loads and in starting the backflow of exhaust gases into the cylinder is performed. Due to this, the starting is better.