Electromagnetic Piston Pump Actuation for Noise Reduction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Piston pumps driven by electromagnets generate noise due to piston impact against a limit stop and have inefficient actuation, leading to suboptimal efficiency and increased wear.

Innovation Solution

A method for detecting the impact time point of the piston on the limit stop by analyzing the time characteristics of electrical state variables, such as current or voltage, allowing for improved control and regulation of the pumping process, which includes determining the impact time point through temporal derivation or differential characteristics, and using this information to optimize the energization of the coil to reduce noise and energy consumption.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If the coil is energized for a fixed duration to drive the piston, then the pump action is completed, but the piston impacts the limit stop causing noise and wear

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepump action completionVSAvoidnoise and wear from piston impact
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies dynamics by making the coil energization duration variable rather than fixed. The control device adjusts the energization time based on detected piston position and velocity, allowing the piston to decelerate before reaching the limit stop. This dynamic adjustment resolves the contradiction by maintaining pump productivity while eliminating harmful impacts through adaptive timing control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements feedback by using sensors to detect piston position and velocity, then feeding this information back to the control device. The control device uses this feedback to dynamically adjust the coil energization duration, ensuring the piston reaches the limit stop with minimal velocity. This feedback mechanism resolves the contradiction by enabling real-time optimization of energization timing to prevent harmful impacts while maintaining pumping efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Object-affected harmful factors

If the coil is energized longer to reduce piston velocity and prevent impact, then noise and wear are reduced, but energy consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepiston impact noise and wearVSAvoidcoil energization energy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies partial action by energizing the coil only for the necessary duration to achieve the desired piston velocity at the limit stop, rather than using excessive energization time. The control device calculates and applies just enough energy to decelerate the piston appropriately, avoiding both harmful impacts and unnecessary energy consumption. This principle resolves the contradiction by optimizing energization to the minimum required level.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Object-affected harmful factors

If the piston velocity is reduced before reaching the limit stop, then noise and wear are reduced, but the pump efficiency decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimpact noise and wearVSAvoidpump efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by initiating the deceleration process before the piston reaches the limit stop. The control device detects the piston approach and adjusts coil energization in advance to reduce velocity gradually, ensuring the piston arrives at the limit stop with minimal impact velocity. This preliminary velocity reduction maintains pump efficiency by avoiding abrupt stops while still preventing harmful impacts.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The method significantly reduces noise and wear by optimizing the energization of the coil, allowing the piston to reach the limit stop at a lower speed with reduced energy input, thereby improving the efficiency and operational performance of the piston pump.

Implementation Method 1

When a current flows in the coil 1, a magnetic flux is generated through the interior thereof. Consequently, the piston 2 is magnetically repelled from the valve unit 7

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectromagnetic induction: Electromagnetic Induction

Implementation Method 2

the helical spring 5 is pretensioned against its abutment 6. The volume between the valve unit 7 and the piston head 4 expands... By the pretensioning of the helical spring 5, the piston 2 is then moved in the direction of the valve unit 7

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElasticity: Elasticity

Data Source

PatentUS10989186B2Operating method and actuation device for a piston pump
Publication Date: 2021.04.27 ROBERT BOSCH GMBH
  • US10989186B2 patent drawing
  • US10989186B2 patent drawing
  • US10989186B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The invention relates to a method for operating a piston pump (10) which is driven by means of a coil (1) of an electromagnet. A piston (2) of the piston pump (10) can be moved in a cylinder (3) for pumping purposes by means of the electromagnet. A voltage (U) is applied to the coil (1) during a switch-on period such that a current flows through the coil (1) and the piston (2) is accelerated, said voltage being applied by means of an actuation device (11). A time curve of an electric state variable (I, U) of the coil (1) is qualitatively detected, and the curve or a curve derived therefrom is analyzed in order to detect an impact of the piston (2) against a stop. The invention further relates to an actuation device and a piston pump.