Hydraulic Piston Sleeve Counterforce Design for High-Speed Sealing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing hydraulic devices experience leakage due to tilting torques on sleeves at high rotational speeds, leading to inefficiency, as passive spring means are insufficient to prevent tilting and maintain sealing at high rotational speeds.

Innovation Solution

Incorporation of actuators, such as levers with counterweights, that exert counter forces on sleeves to balance centrifugal forces, minimizing tilting torques and maintaining sealing by actively counteracting the tilting movements.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If passive spring means are used to press sleeves against barrel plates, then sealing is maintained at low rotational speeds, but at high rotational speeds the spring force is insufficient to prevent tilting of sleeves

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesealing effectivenessVSAvoidrotational speed
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSSpeed

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs actuators that generate counter forces opposing the centrifugal forces acting on sleeves during rotation. These actuators actively balance the tilting torques that increase with rotational speed, maintaining sleeve alignment and sealing effectiveness across the full operational speed range, whereas passive springs cannot compensate for high-speed centrifugal effects.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #8Anti-weight (Counterweight)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent transitions from static passive spring means to dynamic active actuators that can adjust their output forces in response to varying operational conditions. The actuators are controlled to increase counter forces with increasing rotational speed, adapting to the changing centrifugal loads that cause sleeve tilting at high speeds.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Reliability

If sleeves are pressed against barrel plates through compression chamber pressure, then sealing is improved, but at low oil pressure the pressing force is very low leading to tilting and leakage

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesealing effectivenessVSAvoidoil pressure
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSStress or pressure

Solution Approach 1:

The actuators provide active counter forces that compensate for insufficient compression chamber pressure at low oil pressures. By generating opposing forces to centrifugal tilting torques, the actuators maintain sleeve alignment and prevent leakage even when the passive pressure-based pressing mechanism is inadequate.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #8Anti-weight (Counterweight)

3Reliability

If spring force is increased to prevent tilting at high rotational speeds, then sealing is improved, but the device complexity and energy consumption increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesealing effectivenessVSAvoidretaining element structure
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs controllable actuators that can dynamically adjust their output forces based on operational conditions rather than using oversized springs that must accommodate maximum speed conditions throughout. This dynamic approach allows for optimized force application that reduces overall system complexity compared to heavily reinforced passive spring mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The actuators are controlled to vary their counter forces with rotational speed, applying appropriate force levels matched to actual operating conditions. This parameter-based control enables effective sealing at high speeds without requiring the constant high forces that would necessitate complex oversized spring mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The actuators effectively minimize tilting torques and prevent leakage by balancing centrifugal forces, ensuring efficient operation even at high rotational speeds.

Implementation Method 1

a centrifugal force on the cooperating sleeve acts in radial direction from the second axis of rotation between the barrel plate and a center point of the piston head causing a tilting torque about the center point of the piston head

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCentrifugal force: Centrifugal Force

Implementation Method 2

Incorporation of actuators, such as levers with counterweights, that exert counter forces on sleeves to balance centrifugal forces

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMechanical force: Mechanical Force

Data Source

PatentUS12553410B2Hydraulic device
Publication Date: 2026.02.17 BUCHER HYDRAULICS AG
  • US12553410B2 patent drawing
  • US12553410B2 patent drawing
  • US12553410B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A hydraulic device comprises a housing and a shaft with a flange extending perpendicularly to a first axis of rotation. A plurality of pistons are fixed to the flange and move each in a sleeve supported by and rotatable with a barrel plate. The barrel plate is provided with a plurality of actuators for exerting counter forces (Fa) on the respective sleeves in a direction and at a location such that at least when one of the pistons is at bottom dead center under operating conditions the counter force on the cooperating sleeve acts along a line at a distance from the center point of the piston head and causes a counter torque about the center point of the piston head against the tilting torque, wherein the actuators are controlled such that the counter forces increase with increasing rotational speed of the barrel plate about the second axis of rotation.