Pivot Handle With Locking Pawl For Compactor

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Walk-behind construction equipment handles lack versatility and ease of use, particularly in transitioning between operational and storage positions, as they often require manual effort to pivot or collapse, and lack secure locking mechanisms to prevent accidental movement.

Innovation Solution

The handle design incorporates a pivot joint with a locking pawl and a support pin, along with a locking mechanism featuring movable locking pins and a release handle, allowing the upper handle portion to pivot or rotate relative to the lower portion between deployed and collapsed positions, with secure locking and easy unlocking mechanisms.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If a fixed handle design is used, then structural simplicity is maintained, but versatility and ease of use are reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehandle position adaptabilityVSAvoidhandle structure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The handle structure transitions from a fixed design to a dynamic one with multiple positions. The upper handle portion can pivot relative to the lower handle portion about a support pin, allowing the handle to adapt between operational and storage positions. This dynamic capability directly improves versatility while maintaining reasonable structural complexity through the use of a simple pivot mechanism.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The handle is divided into distinct segments: an upper handle portion and a lower handle portion connected by a pivot joint. This segmentation allows independent movement of each portion, enabling the handle to assume different configurations. The segmentation principle resolves the contradiction by providing positional adaptability through modular sections while keeping each section structurally simple.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Ease of operation

If manual effort is required to pivot the handle, then structural simplicity is maintained, but ease of operation deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehandle position transitionVSAvoidlocking mechanism complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The locking mechanism operates on a self-service principle where the release handle automatically actuates the locking and unlocking actions. When the release handle is moved, it triggers the locking pins to engage or disengage from their respective guides, providing automatic locking without requiring additional manual effort. This improves ease of operation while keeping the mechanism relatively simple.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The release handle serves as an intermediary element between the user and the locking pins. Instead of directly manipulating the locking pins, the user operates the release handle, which in turn moves the locking pins along their guides. This intermediary mechanism simplifies the user's interaction while providing secure locking, resolving the contradiction between ease of operation and mechanism complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Reliability

If a locking mechanism is added, then reliability is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehandle position stabilityVSAvoidlocking mechanism complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The locking mechanism is segmented into independent locking pin assemblies, with each pin operating within its own guide. This segmentation allows each locking pin to function independently, providing reliable position stability while keeping the overall mechanism relatively simple. The modular nature of segmented locking pins reduces complexity compared to a single complex locking system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Instead of using a single complex locking pin, the design uses multiple simpler locking pins distributed at different locations. This inversion approach trades a single complex element for multiple simple elements, achieving higher reliability through redundancy while actually reducing overall mechanism complexity. Each simple locking pin provides independent stability, resolving the contradiction between reliability and complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

4Reliability

If the handle is made secure against accidental movement, then reliability is improved, but ease of operation may deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprevention of accidental movementVSAvoidhandle position change
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The locking mechanism features a self-service design where the normal operational forces applied to the handle are insufficient to actuate the locking pins. The locking pins are biased into the locked position and require a deliberate action on the release handle to disengage. This self-service特性 prevents accidental movement while maintaining ease of operation, as the intended operational forces cannot inadvertently trigger unlocking.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The locking pins provide preliminary anti-action by being pre-positioned to engage with the locking surfaces before any movement occurs. This preliminary engagement prevents accidental movement by counteracting any unintended forces. The design ensures that only a deliberate action on the release handle can overcome this preliminary anti-action, thus preventing accidental movement while allowing intentional position changes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #9Preliminary anti-action

Data Source

PatentUS20230030584A1Plate compactor handle
Publication Date: 2023.02.02 MILWAUKEE ELECTRIC TOOL CORP
  • US20230030584A1 patent drawing
  • US20230030584A1 patent drawing
  • US20230030584A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A handle for a construction tool includes a lower handle portion configured to be coupled to the construction tool, an upper handle portion configured to be grasped by a user, a support pin disposed between the upper handle portion to the lower handle portion, and a locking mechanism configured to selectively secure the upper handle portion relative to the lower handle portion. The upper handle portion pivotable relative to the lower handle portion about the support pin. The locking mechanism includes a locking pin movable between a lock position, in which the upper handle portion is not pivotable relative to the lower handle portion, and an unlock position, in which the upper handle portion is pivotable relative to the lower handle portion, and a release handle configured to selectively move the locking pin between the lock position and the unlock position.