Pivot Runner for Fall Protection with Spring-Loaded Segmentation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing runners for fall protection devices require two hands to be placed on and removed from the rail and have complex mechanical mechanisms to prevent unintentional opening, making them cumbersome and difficult to operate.

Innovation Solution

A rotor design with a pivot axis perpendicular to the central longitudinal axis of the guide opening, allowing for one-handed operation and secure attachment/detachment using snap hooks, and incorporating a spring element for additional security, eliminating the need for additional latching means.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If two half-shells are used to form the guide opening, then the runner can be placed anywhere on the rail, but two hands are required to place and remove the runner

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveplacement flexibilityVSAvoidhands required for operation
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The runner is divided into two half-shells that can pivot relative to each other. This segmentation allows the runner to be opened wide for placement and then closed to secure the lifeline, enabling one-handed operation while maintaining placement flexibility anywhere along the rail.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The half-shells are connected via a pivot axis, creating a dynamic structure that can transition between open and closed positions. This dynamic mechanism allows the runner to be easily opened for placement and automatically secures when closed, eliminating the need for two hands during operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Reliability

If a mechanically complex mechanism is used to secure the half-shells against unintentional opening, then the runner is secure, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesecurity against unintentional openingVSAvoidmechanical mechanism complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The spring element automatically pushes the half-shells into the closed position, providing self-securing functionality. The system uses the natural closing motion and spring force to ensure the runner remains secure without requiring additional complex latching mechanisms or manual intervention.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The spring element changes the mechanical state of the half-shells from a static locked position to a dynamically maintained closed position. The spring force continuously acts to keep the half-shells closed, providing reliable security against unintentional opening while keeping the mechanism simple.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If additional latching means are added to fix the two parts in the closed position, then the runner is more secure, but the manufacturing complexity and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesecurity in closed positionVSAvoidmanufacturing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The spring element provides automatic latching functionality by continuously pushing the half-shells into the closed position. This self-securing mechanism eliminates the need for additional latching means such as locks, buttons, or clips, thereby simplifying manufacturing while maintaining security.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The invention removes the need for separate latching components by integrating the latching function into the basic pivot mechanism itself. The spring element and pivot axis work together to provide both the closing action and the latching function, extracting the latching requirement from the overall system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enables simple and secure one-handed operation of the runner on an anchorage device, preventing unintentional opening or detachment, while reducing manufacturing complexity and cost, allowing for compact and cost-effective design.

Implementation Method 1

a spring element is arranged between the two parts, which acts on the two parts in the direction of the closed position with a restoring spring force

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSpring force: Spring

Data Source

PatentEP1716889B1Runner for a fall protection device
Publication Date: 2008.07.02 SKYLOTEC GMBH
  • EP1716889B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP1716889B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP1716889B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

The runner (10) has a housing with an attachment eye (15) for a person-bearing rope, and an axial-symmetric guide opening (16) for enclosing a device (18) to be fastened, i.e. a safety rope or safety bar. The housing comprises two parts (12,14), each with an attachment eye, and pivotable about a pivot axis (24).