Pivotable Gripping Arms With Spring Elements For Container Handling

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing container handling devices face limitations in material choice for gripping arms due to restricted design, and require complex control mechanisms for switching between blocking and release states, which complicates the handling and transportation of containers.

Innovation Solution

A container gripper design featuring pivotable gripping arms tensioned by spring elements, with a control element that moves between release and blocking states, allowing secure container transfer and handling through adjustable spring forces without a positive-fit blocking mechanism, facilitating easy assembly and disassembly.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If backwards-facing spring-elastic extensions are used as gripping arms, then the gripping arms can be produced as one piece with spring elements, but the choice of materials for production is severely restricted

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegriping arm productionVSAvoidmaterial choice
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The gripping arm is divided into separate components: the gripping arm itself and the spring element. This allows each component to be manufactured from optimal materials independently, with the gripping arm made from material suitable for gripping function and the spring element from elastic material, thereby expanding material choice while maintaining ease of manufacture

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The spring element is integrated with the gripping arm through a connection mechanism (such as a bearing or pivot connection), combining the advantages of separate component manufacturing with the benefits of a unified gripping assembly, allowing material versatility while maintaining manufacturing simplicity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

2Ease of operation

If a control element rotates about an axis parallel to the pivot axis of gripping arms to control blocking and releasing states, then the mechanism can switch between states, but the control arrangement becomes complex

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveblocking and releasing state switchingVSAvoidcontrol arrangement
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of rotating the control element about an axis parallel to the pivot axis, the control element is designed to move in a linear or simplified rotational path that directly actuates the gripping arms, inverting the conventional control mechanism approach and reducing control arrangement complexity while maintaining ease of operation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

Solution Approach 2:

A simplified intermediary mechanism (such as a cam, lever, or direct contact surface) is introduced between the control element and the gripping arms, mediating the control action in a way that reduces the complexity of the control arrangement while preserving the ability to switch between blocking and releasing states

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Reliability

If a closure element moves in a curve-controlled manner to block gripping arms radially, then positive-fit blocking is achieved, but the mechanism requires complex curve control

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepositive-fit blockingVSAvoidcurve control mechanism
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The complex curve control mechanism is extracted or eliminated from the system. Instead, a simpler blocking mechanism is used that achieves positive-fit blocking through direct mechanical engagement or spring-loaded latching, removing the need for complex curve control while maintaining reliability of the blocking function

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The blocking mechanism is designed to be self-actuating or self-regulating, using the inherent motion of the gripping arms or spring forces to automatically engage and disengage the closure element, thereby achieving reliable positive-fit blocking without requiring complex external curve control

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution enables simplified control and handling of containers by adjusting spring forces for secure gripping and easy release, improving material flexibility and reducing assembly complexity, while maintaining effective container handling during operations like filling or labeling.

Implementation Method 1

Each container gripper comprises at least two pivotable gripping arms which are respectively pretensioned by at least one spring element in a closed position

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSpring force: Spring

Data Source

PatentUS10189653B2Device for transporting containers, such as beverage bottles
Publication Date: 2019.01.29 KHS GMBH
  • US10189653B2 patent drawing
  • US10189653B2 patent drawing
  • US10189653B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A device for transporting containers. The abstract of the disclosure is submitted herewith as required by 37 C.F.R. § 1.72(b). As stated in 37 C.F.R. § 1.72(b): A brief abstract of the technical disclosure in the specification must commence on a separate sheet, preferably following the claims, under the heading “Abstract of the Disclosure.” The purpose of the abstract is to enable the Patent and Trademark Office and the public generally to determine quickly from a cursory inspection the nature and gist of the technical disclosure. The abstract shall not be used for interpreting the scope of the claims. Therefore, any statements made relating to the abstract are not intended to limit the claims in any manner and should not be interpreted as limiting the claims in any manner.