Pivotable Marine Riser Guide Structure for Offshore Stability

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing guide arrangements for marine risers, particularly in offshore oil and gas operations, face challenges in stabilizing light and flexible risers under dynamic conditions, requiring large bending stiffeners that increase costs and complexity.

Innovation Solution

The guide structure is pivotably supported by a frame assembly with a horizontal pivot axis, allowing for angular movement and reducing bending stress, eliminating the need for large bend stiffeners, and featuring a lighter steel structure with easy installation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Stability of the object's composition

If a fixed guide structure with upward curvature is used to stabilize risers, then the riser stability is improved, but the bending stress and required stiffener size increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveriser stabilityVSAvoidbending stress
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSStress or pressure

Solution Approach 1:

The guide structure is made movable relative to the frame assembly, allowing it to pivot and adjust its position dynamically. This dynamic capability enables the guide structure to accommodate riser movements without imposing large bending stresses, resolving the contradiction between stability and stress reduction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The guide structure is separated from the frame assembly as an independent movable component. This segmentation allows the guide structure to move independently, reducing the transmission of bending stresses to the riser while maintaining stabilizing function through the frame assembly and anchor means.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Stability of the object's composition

If a fixed guide structure with upward curvature is used to stabilize risers, then the riser stability is improved, but the device complexity and cost increase due to large bend stiffeners

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveriser stabilityVSAvoidstiffener complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The movable guide structure eliminates the need for large fixed bend stiffeners by allowing dynamic adjustment. This reduces device complexity while maintaining stability, as the guide structure can adapt to riser movements without requiring oversized stiffening components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The guide structure's position and orientation parameters are made variable rather than fixed. This allows the structure to adapt to different riser configurations and movement conditions, reducing the need for large stiffeners and simplifying the overall device design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Stress or pressure

If a movable guide structure with horizontal pivot axis is used, then the bending stress is reduced, but the device complexity increases due to pivot mechanism

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebending stressVSAvoidpivot mechanism complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Stress or pressureVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The pivot mechanism provides simple dynamic adjustment capability with minimal complexity. The horizontal pivot axis allows the guide structure to move freely in the necessary direction, reducing bending stress while introducing only the essential mechanical complexity required for movement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The pivot mechanism is extracted as a simple, dedicated component rather than being integrated into a complex structure. This allows the pivot function to be implemented with minimal complexity, achieving stress reduction without proportionally increasing overall device complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This solution reduces bending stress and strain on risers, eliminates the need for large stiffeners, and simplifies installation while maintaining stability against lateral movements caused by sea currents and waves.

Implementation Method 1

a buoyancy element for keeping said guide structure at a desired level in the sea during operation

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectBuoyancy: Archimedes' Principle (Buoyancy)

Implementation Method 2

the guide structure pivotably supported by said frame assembly with a pivot axis being substantially horizontal

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPivoting: Hinge

Data Source

PatentUS8152411B2Guide arrangement
Publication Date: 2012.04.10 NEXANS SA
  • US8152411B2 patent drawing
  • US8152411B2 patent drawing
  • US8152411B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Guide arrangement for marine risers, in particular for offshore oil and gas operations. The guide arrangement has at least one guide structure (21, 22) for a length of riser, a frame assembly (10, 10A-D) for supporting said guide structure, anchor means (11, 12) at the seabed, tether means (13, 14) connecting said frame assembly to said anchor means, and a buoyancy element (1) for keeping said guide structure (21, 22) at a desired level in the sea during operation. The guide structure (21, 22) is pivotably supported by said frame assembly (10, 10A-D) with a pivot axis (21P, 22P) being substantially horizontal.