Pivoting Finger Centraliser for Deviated Well Cementing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional centralisers have limited load-bearing capacity, which can lead to ineffective centralisation of tubulars in deviated wells, resulting in incomplete cement encasement during cementing operations.

Innovation Solution

A centraliser design featuring pivotally mounted fingers and moveable collars that transition between a run-in and extended configuration, engaging the conduit wall to centralise the tubular, with a track and lug arrangement for controlled deployment and deployment, and a locking device to maintain the extended configuration under well pressure.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If conventional centralisers are used in deviated wells, then the tubular can be centralised, but the load bearing capacity is limited and cement may not flow fully around the tubular

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveload bearing capacityVSAvoidcentralisation effectiveness
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The centraliser employs dynamic fingers that can pivot between a retracted configuration during run-in and an extended configuration during centralisation. This dynamic transformation allows the centraliser to adapt to different operational phases, providing both easy deployment and high load-bearing capacity when needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The centraliser body is divided into multiple independent fingers that can move relative to each other. Each finger can be independently extended to engage the conduit wall, distributing the load across multiple contact points and significantly increasing the overall load bearing capacity while maintaining reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Reliability

If the centraliser fingers are extended to engage the conduit wall, then the tubular is centralised, but the device complexity increases with multiple moving parts

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecentralisation effectivenessVSAvoidstructure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The fingers serve multiple functions: they act as structural support elements during run-in, transform into load-bearing engagement elements during centralisation, and can be locked in position to maintain centralisation. This multi-functionality reduces the need for separate components for each operational phase.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The fingers are nested within the centraliser body in the retracted configuration, allowing them to be stored compactly during deployment. When activation is required, the fingers extend outward from the body, transforming from a compact nested state to an extended engagement state without requiring separate storage mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #7Nested doll (Nesting)

3Strength

If the collar moves towards the body to pivot the finger to extended configuration, then the finger engages the conduit wall, but the device complexity increases with additional moving components

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveengagement forceVSAvoidmechanism complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The collar acts as an intermediary component that translates axial movement into radial finger extension. By moving along the finger's length, the collar pivots the finger from the retracted to the extended configuration, providing a simple mechanical means to convert linear motion into the desired angular motion without complex linkages.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The finger's own geometry and the collar's movement along it create the pivoting action automatically. The mechanical arrangement allows the collar's linear displacement to self-generate the rotational motion of the finger through the defined geometric relationship between the collar path and the finger pivot point.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The centraliser effectively centralises tubulars in deviated conduits, ensuring complete cement encasement and stable operation by distributing load and maintaining engagement with the conduit wall, even under varying pressure conditions.

Implementation Method 1

relative movement between the/each collar and the body pivots the at least one finger from a run-in configuration to an extended configuration

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMechanical Force: Mechanical Force

Implementation Method 2

the/each collar moves towards the body to pivot the/each finger from the run-in configuration to the extended configuration

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMechanical Force: Mechanical Force

Implementation Method 3

engage and press against the conduit wall, moving the tubular towards the centre of the conduit

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFriction: Friction

Data Source

PatentUS8820417B2Centraliser
Publication Date: 2014.09.02 WEATHERFORD TECHNOLOGY HOLDINGS LLC
  • US8820417B2 patent drawing
  • US8820417B2 patent drawing
  • US8820417B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A centraliser (10) for centralising a tubular (12) within a conduit is described. The centraliser comprises a centraliser body, at least one finger (14) pivotally mounted to the body and at least one collar (20), the/each collar being moveable with respect to the at least one finger. Relative movement between the/each collar and the body pivots the at least one finger from a run-in configuration to an extended configuration.