Pivoting Firing Board Mount for Low-Wear Fluid Ejection Controllers

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing fluid ejection systems for assays are prone to errors and inefficiencies due to manual operation, and the frequent insertion and removal of disposable fluid ejection devices can wear down electrical pins, leading to system failure and high maintenance costs.

Innovation Solution

A fluid ejection controller with a floating firing board and biasing springs that pivotally holds the firing board away from the insertion slot, allowing for secure electrical connection only after the device is inserted, reducing wear and enhancing connector reliability.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Shape

If a non-pivoting firing board is used, then the board structure is simple and easy to manufacture, but the fluid ejection controllers cannot be properly positioned at an angle relative to the print head

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepositioning capabilityVSAvoidboard structure
Core Design Contradiction:
ShapeVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The firing board is designed to be pivotable about a pivot axis, changing its angular parameter relative to the print head. This allows the board to be positioned at different angles (e.g., 45 degrees) to properly orient the fluid ejection controllers, while maintaining a simple flat board structure when not pivoted.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Ease of operation

If the firing board is pivotable, then the fluid ejection controllers can be properly positioned, but the board requires additional pivot mechanisms increasing complexity

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontroller positioningVSAvoidpivot mechanism
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The firing board assembly is segmented into the pivotable board portion and the fixed support structure. This segmentation allows the board to be independently pivoted to position the controllers correctly, while the support structure remains simple and stationary.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Reliability

If fluid ejection controllers are positioned at an angle, then droplet ejection performance is improved, but the mounting structure becomes more complex

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedroplet ejection performanceVSAvoidmounting structure
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The firing board is made dynamically pivotable rather than fixed, allowing the fluid ejection controllers to be positioned at the optimal angle for droplet ejection. The pivot mechanism enables adjustment to achieve proper orientation, improving ejection reliability without requiring a permanently complex mounted structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution increases the lifespan of the fluid ejection system, reduces the likelihood of accidental device removal, enhances connector reliability, and provides visual confirmation of proper insertion, thereby improving the efficiency and robustness of the fluid ejection process.

Implementation Method 1

at least one biasing spring to bias the firing board away from the fluid ejection device during insertion of the fluid ejection device

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElasticity: Elasticity

Data Source

PatentEP3941632B1Fluid ejection controllers to pivotally hold firing boards
Publication Date: 2024.02.28 HEWLETT PACKARD DEVELOPMENT COMPANY LP
  • EP3941632B1 patent drawingFigure 1A
  • EP3941632B1 patent drawingFigure 1B
  • EP3941632B1 patent drawingFigure 2

AI summary

In one example in accordance with the present disclosure, a fluid ejection controller is described. The fluid ejection controller includes a firing board to pass control signals to a fluid ejection device to eject fluid from the fluid ejection device. A mount pivotally holds the firing board between a disengaged position where electrical pins of the firing board are not in contact with electrical pads of the fluid ejection device and an engaged position where the electrical pins are in contact with the electrical pads. The mount includes a slot to receive the fluid ejection device and at least one biasing spring to bias the firing board away from the fluid ejection device during insertion of the fluid ejection device. The fluid ejection controller also includes a handle coupled to a cam shaft to move the firing board between the disengaged position and the engaged position.