Pivoting Restraint Bar for Secure Prisoner Seating

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional restraint systems for prisoners in police vehicles and stationary structures are inadequate, as they pose safety risks for officers and allow prisoners to potentially unsecure themselves, and there is a need for a supplemental restraint system that operates independently of handcuffs to maintain secure custody.

Innovation Solution

A supplemental restraint system featuring a pivotal restraint bar that can be moved between raised and lowered positions, locked in place, and easily released by a police officer, which is mounted to a stationary structure's wall and floor, incorporating a locking mechanism and actuation tab to secure and release prisoners effectively.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a conventional seat belt restraint system is used in police vehicles, then the prisoner can be secured to the seat, but the officer must reach across the prisoner to secure the belt which creates safety risks for the officer

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesecurity of prisoner restraintVSAvoidsafety risk to officer
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces an intermediary restraint mechanism (retractable strap with locking retraction mechanism) that mediates between the officer and the prisoner. The strap is mounted behind the seat and extends through the seat to secure the prisoner, allowing the officer to secure the prisoner from behind the seat rather than reaching across the prisoner's body, thus eliminating the safety risk while maintaining restraint effectiveness

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If a conventional seat belt restraint system is used, then the prisoner can be secured, but the prisoner can reach the seat belt latch to release it which creates safety concerns

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesecurity of prisoner restraintVSAvoidaccessibility of release mechanism
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The retractable strap with locking retraction mechanism serves as an intermediary that the prisoner cannot access or manipulate. The strap is mounted behind the seat and the locking mechanism is positioned such that the prisoner cannot reach it, while the officer can easily access and operate the release mechanism from behind the seat

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The release mechanism is moved to a different spatial dimension - behind the seat rather than on the front or side where the prisoner can reach it. This dimensional relocation ensures the prisoner cannot access the release mechanism while the officer can easily operate it

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

3Reliability

If a supplemental restraint system with retractable strap is used in police vehicles, then the prisoner is securely restrained, but the system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesecurity of prisoner restraintVSAvoidcomplexity of restraint system
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The retractable strap incorporates a locking retraction mechanism that automatically locks when the strap is extended and secured to the prisoner's handcuffs. The system serves itself by automatically maintaining tension and security without requiring continuous manual intervention, reducing operational complexity despite the added mechanical components

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The supplemental restraint system merges multiple functions into a single integrated mechanism: the retractable strap provides both the restraining function and the securing function through its locking retraction mechanism, combining what would otherwise be separate components into one unified system

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

4Ease of operation

If handcuffed prisoners are restrained to movable structures like chairs, then the restraint can be easily applied, but the prisoner can be rocked or upset which creates injury risks

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of applying restraintVSAvoidstability of prisoner position
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The restraint system is segmented into multiple independent components: the mounting structure attached to the stationary structure, the retractable strap with locking mechanism, and the connection to handcuffs. This segmentation allows the restraint to be applied easily to handcuffed prisoners while the distributed mounting points provide stability and prevent rocking or upsetting

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS9603450B2Stationary restraint system for police structures
Publication Date: 2017.03.28 PLANER MATTHEW J
  • US9603450B2 patent drawing
  • US9603450B2 patent drawing
  • US9603450B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A supplemental restraint system that is mountable to the frame of a stationary structure, such as a police station or other building, to secure a prisoner in a seated position. The supplemental restraint system includes a restraint bar that is pivotally supported on the mounting plate for movement between a raised inoperative position and a lowered operative position. A locking mechanism secures the restraint bar in any selected lowered position and includes an actuation lever for selectively releasing the locking mechanism to permit the restraint bar to be raised for release of the prisoner. A spring mechanism biases the restraint bar toward a raised position so that the restraint bar can be moved upwardly while the police officer is outside of the police vehicle. Mounting plates can be utilized to secure the supplemental restraint system to the floor structure and an adjacent wall structure.