Pivoting Groove-Forming Spindle for Precise Board Cutting

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for forming grooves in board elements are inefficient, lack precision, and cause excessive stress and wear on cutting elements, leading to increased idle time in manufacturing.

Innovation Solution

An arrangement with a support member and cutting elements on a spindle member that pivots relative to the support, using a single-direction driving mechanism and counterweight to improve efficiency and precision, while reducing stress and wear, and allowing for quick replacement of cutting elements.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If conventional groove forming methods are used, then grooves can be formed in board elements, but the process is inefficient and causes excessive stress and wear on cutting elements

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegroove forming efficiencyVSAvoidcutting element lifespan
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies parameter changes by heating the board element to elevated temperature (e.g., 50-150°C above ambient) before groove forming. This thermal parameter change softens thermoplastic materials, reducing cutting resistance and stress on cutting elements while improving groove forming efficiency and precision

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements dynamics through a pivoting mechanism that allows the spindle member to move between a retracted position (during heating/feeding) and a forming position (during groove cutting). This dynamic positioning optimizes the cutting process by reducing idle movements and maintaining consistent cutting pressure, thereby extending cutting element lifespan

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Manufacturing precision

If conventional groove forming methods are used, then grooves can be formed, but precision and control are insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegroove formation precisionVSAvoidarrangement complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent incorporates feedback through sensors that monitor the board element's position, temperature, and groove forming progress. This feedback enables real-time adjustments to heating power, spindle positioning, and cutting depth, ensuring high manufacturing precision while managing system complexity through automated control

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies preliminary action by pre-heating the board element and positioning the spindle member in the retracted position before groove forming begins. This preparation ensures optimal material conditions and precise alignment, reducing the need for complex real-time adjustments during cutting

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Loss of time

If conventional groove forming methods are used, then grooves can be formed, but idle time in manufacturing increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing idle timeVSAvoidenergy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements continuity of useful action by overlapping the heating process with the feeding and positioning operations. The board element is continuously heated and advanced through the forming zone without stopping, eliminating idle time between operations while managing energy consumption through coordinated process control

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies periodic action through the oscillating or reciprocating motion of the spindle member during groove cutting. This periodic cutting action maintains consistent material removal rates, reduces cutting element wear, and optimizes the balance between productivity and energy consumption

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Data Source

PatentUS12589519B2Arrangement and method for forming grooves in a board element
Publication Date: 2026.03.31 CERALOC INNOVATION AB
  • US12589519B2 patent drawing
  • US12589519B2 patent drawing
  • US12589519B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An arrangement for forming grooves in a board element. The arrangement includes a support member for supporting the board element during the forming and cutting elements arranged on a spindle member configured to rotate around a rotational axis. The cutting elements are configured to form the grooves by removing material from the board element. The spindle member is arranged in a pivot body configured to be pivoted with respect to the support member. The arrangement includes a driving device configured to drive the pivot body, wherein the driving device is configured to rotate in a single direction during a groove forming cycle.