Pivoting Squeeze Chute Wall for Calf Handling

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional cattle squeeze chute and head gate assemblies are mechanically complex, bulky, and create a dead-end channel that hesitantly entered by livestock, making them inefficient for handling and treatment.

Innovation Solution

A calf handling apparatus featuring a forwardly pivoting squeeze chute wall that functions as a holding, guiding 'V' channel, and releasing member, with releasable latching mechanisms for secure calf restraint and easy exit, utilizing a base with hoof treads, fixed and pivoting head gate jaws, and hingedly attached walls to form and release a 'V' channel.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If conventional cattle squeeze chute and head gate assemblies are used, then livestock can be held and treated, but the assemblies are mechanically complex and bulky

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecattle holding capabilityVSAvoidmechanical complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The squeeze chute wall is designed to perform multiple functions: it forms the 'V' channel guide, acts as a calf holding member when pivoted forward, and serves as a releasing member when opened. This multi-functional design eliminates the need for separate guiding structures and simplifies the overall mechanical system while maintaining reliable cattle holding capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The invention merges the guiding function, holding function, and releasing function into a single integrated squeeze chute wall structure. By combining these functions that were previously performed by separate components, the overall device complexity is reduced while maintaining the reliability of cattle handling operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

2Reliability

If conventional dead end channel configurations are used, then cattle can be contained, but cattle hesitantly enter the channel

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecattle containment capabilityVSAvoidcattle entry ease
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The squeeze chute wall is designed to be dynamically reconfigurable, transitioning from a closed 'V' channel configuration that guides cattle forward to an open configuration where the wall pivots forward to release the calf. This dynamic transformation allows the structure to provide containment when needed while eliminating the dead-end effect during entry and exit, making operation easier.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

Instead of using a fixed dead-end channel that contains cattle through confinement, the invention inverts the approach by using a forwardly pivoting wall that releases cattle by opening forward. This inversion transforms the containing structure into a releasing mechanism, eliminating hesitation during entry while maintaining containment capability when the wall is in the closed position.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

3Reliability

If conventional squeeze chute designs are used, then cattle can be restrained, but the structures are excessively bulky

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecalf restraint capabilityVSAvoidstructure bulk
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSVolume of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The squeeze chute wall serves as a multi-functional component that replaces multiple separate structures. By having this single wall perform guiding, holding, and releasing functions, the overall volume and bulk of the stationary structure is reduced while maintaining reliable calf restraint capability through the wall's pivoting action and latching mechanism.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Facilitates smooth entry and exit of calves, reduces mechanical complexity, and enhances operational efficiency during handling and treatment by providing a secure yet non-confining environment.

Implementation Method 1

a third wall which is preferably hingedly attached to the first wall's oppositely lateral side for movement of the third wall between calf holding, 'V' channel forming, and calf releasing positions

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHinge: Hinge

Implementation Method 2

Second releasable latching means are preferably associated with the third wall's rearward end, the second releasable latching means being adapted for, upon pivoting movement of the third wall toward the calf holding position, resisting any counter-pivoting motions of the third wall away from such position

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMechanical Fastener: Mechanical Fastener

Implementation Method 3

a plurality of hoof treads configured as laterally extending ridges may be welded to the upper surface of the base

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFriction: Friction

Data Source

PatentUS8360010B1Calf handling apparatus
Publication Date: 2013.01.29 BOALDEN DIXIE E
  • US8360010B1 patent drawing
  • US8360010B1 patent drawing
  • US8360010B1 patent drawing

AI summary

A calf handling apparatus incorporating a base having a forward end, a first wall fixedly attached to and extending upwardly from the base's forward end, the first wall having a lateral side and an oppositely lateral side, and the first wall including a pivoting head gate jaw; a second wall fixedly attached to the base, the second wall extending rearwardly from the first wall's lateral side; and a third wall, the third wall being hingedly attached to the first wall's oppositely lateral side for movement between calf holding and calf releasing positions, the third wall extending rearwardly from the first wall's oppositely lateral side upon movement to the calf holding position, the third wall being displaced oppositely laterally from the calf holding position upon movement to the calf releasing position.