Device for holding up utensils for daily use

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing devices for supporting handles and pipes of household appliances are mechanically demanding, potentially damaging the surfaces they are attached to and are complex and costly to manufacture.

Innovation Solution

A one-piece support element with a self-retaining stability feature, such as a foot element, is movably arranged on a base element, which is elongated with a groove-like cross-section and limited swivel range, using a hinge-like fastening, and made of rigid materials like steel, aluminum, or plastic, with detachable fastening options.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a clamp with swiveling holder feet is used to fasten the device to the handle or pipe, then the device can provide support and stability, but the fastening means develops too great a mechanical load at certain points, potentially damaging the surface of the object to be fastened

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesupport stabilityVSAvoidsurface damage
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The device is divided into separate functional components: a base element for attachment and a support element for stabilization. This segmentation allows the attachment function to be simplified, reducing mechanical concentration of load on the handle or pipe surface while maintaining overall support stability through the distributed support element.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The base element acts as an intermediary between the support element and the handle/pipe. It provides a simplified attachment mechanism that distributes mechanical loads more evenly, preventing the concentrated stress points that would damage the surface of the object being fastened.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If a clamp with two swiveling holder feet and guide rails is used, then the device can adjust the angle of spread and provide stable support, but the construction becomes technically complex and cost-intensive to manufacture

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesupport stabilityVSAvoidconstruction complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The device separates the attachment function (base element) from the support function (support element), eliminating the need for complex integrated mechanisms like guide rails and multiple swiveling joints. Each element is simple in design, reducing manufacturing complexity while maintaining stability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Instead of making the entire clamp assembly complex and adjustable, the invention simplifies the attachment mechanism and relies on the geometry and arrangement of the support element to provide stability. The complexity is inverted from the attachment mechanism to the overall spatial arrangement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

3Device complexity

If a one-piece support element is movably arranged on a base element with limited swivel range, then the device simplifies construction and reduces manufacturing costs, but must ensure adequate support stability with reduced mechanical complexity

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconstruction simplicityVSAvoidsupport stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The support element is designed to be movable relative to the base element within a limited swivel range, allowing dynamic adaptation to different handle positions and angles. This dynamic capability maintains support stability without requiring complex mechanical mechanisms, as the movement is constrained to essential adjustments only.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The device utilizes changes in the spatial parameters of the support element (position, angle, orientation) within a limited range to achieve stable support. By controlling and limiting these parameter changes rather than allowing full mechanical complexity, the device maintains reliability while simplifying construction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS20250305626A1Device for holding up utensils for daily use
Publication Date: 2025.10.02 GOTZE JOAN
  • US20250305626A1 patent drawing
  • US20250305626A1 patent drawing
  • US20250305626A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A device (1) for supporting handles, rods, pipes or similar for utensils in the private or industrial field of use, for example in the home, in agriculture, in a workshop or on a road or on a building site. The device (1) consists in principle of two elements which are simple to produce, specifically a main element (2) and a support element (3), which are movably interconnected. The device (1) is detachably fastened by its main element (2) with the aid of a suitable fastening means to the handle to be supported or the pipe to be supported. When used to support the handle of a utensil, the support element (3) is pivoted out by a predefined angle α such that the foot (9) of the support element (3) comes to a stop on the ground at at least two points (13, 13′).