Pivoting Tool Head Locking Mechanism for Tight Spaces

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Tools with pivoting heads often face difficulties in tight spaces due to complex locking mechanisms that are hard to unlock and pivot, leading to usability issues in confined environments.

Innovation Solution

A locking mechanism positioned along the axis of rotation of the pivoting head, featuring a sliding switch or push button actuator, which allows for robust locking and adjustability with reduced complexity, enabling easy operation in tight spaces by minimizing the number of components and simplifying the actuation process.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a complex locking mechanism is used in tools with pivoting heads, then the locking reliability is improved, but the ease of operation deteriorates due to difficulty in unlocking and pivoting in tight spaces

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelocking reliabilityVSAvoidease of unlocking and pivoting
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The locking mechanism is segmented into distinct functional components: a locking member with engagement features, a separate actuating mechanism (push button or sliding switch), and a biasing component. This segmentation allows each component to perform its specific function efficiently, making the overall mechanism simpler to operate while maintaining reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The conventional approach of requiring multiple steps to unlock is inverted by using a push button or sliding switch that directly actuates the locking member to disengage. The biasing component automatically returns the locking member to the locked position upon release, eliminating complex manual manipulation and enabling one-handed operation in tight spaces.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

2Strength

If traditional locking mechanisms are used, then the locking strength is improved, but the device complexity increases due to more components

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelocking strengthVSAvoidnumber of components
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The actuating mechanism and locking member are merged into a compact assembly where the locking member is directly actuated by the push button or sliding switch. The biasing component is integrated within the same housing, creating a unified locking assembly that maintains strong engagement while minimizing the total number of separate components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

Complex multi-step locking sequences and additional safety mechanisms are extracted from the design. The locking function is achieved through a single direct actuation motion (pressing the button or sliding the switch), removing unnecessary intermediate components and simplifying the overall device structure while preserving locking strength.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

3Ease of operation

If a compact locking mechanism is used to reduce components, then the ease of operation in tight spaces is improved, but the locking reliability may deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of operation in tight spacesVSAvoidlocking reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The biasing component is pre-loaded to automatically return the locking member to the engaged position upon release of the actuator. This preliminary action ensures that the locking member is always in the correct position for secure engagement, maintaining reliability despite the simplified compact design and enabling quick operation in confined spaces.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution provides secure locking and increased adjustability in tight spaces with fewer components, enhancing usability and reducing the likelihood of accidental actuation, allowing for effective use in more confined work environments.

Implementation Method 1

The biasing component extends in a generally parallel orientation to the pivot axis and resists movement of the sliding switch

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMechanical Force: Mechanical Force

Implementation Method 2

The ball is positioned between the biasing component and an inward facing surface of the handle

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMechanical Force Transmission: Mechanical Force

Implementation Method 3

The sliding switch includes a plurality of teeth facing the toothed projection of the head

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMechanical Interlocking: Mechanical Fastener

Data Source

PatentEP4371708A1Tool with pivoting portion and locking mechanism
Publication Date: 2024.05.22 MILWAUKEE ELECTRIC TOOL CORP
  • EP4371708A1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP4371708A1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP4371708A1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

A tool with a pivoting head is shown. The tool includes a locking mechanism that allows the angular position of the head to be locked securely in place once selected by a user. In a specific embodiment, the locking mechanism includes a locking channel positioned in a generally parallel orientation to the axis of rotation of the pivoting head. In a specific embodiment, the locking mechanism includes a biasing component positioned in a generally parallel orientation to the axis of rotation of the pivoting head. The locking mechanism may be used with a variety of tools, such as ratchet wrenches, that allow for repositioning of the head relative to the handle of the tool.