Pivoting Wheel Mobile Carriers for Grid-Based Object Sorting

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current object processing systems, such as sortation and storage systems, face inefficiencies and inflexibilities due to the need for a large number of collection bins and high mechanical complexity, which increases costs and limits throughput and divert capabilities.

Innovation Solution

An automated carrier system with pivotally mounted wheels allows for orthogonal movement on a track system, enabling efficient redirection and realignment without rotating the carrier, thus reducing the need for multiple bins and complex divert mechanisms.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Extent of automation

If recirculating conveyors with tilt trays are used for automated sortation, then objects can be automatically routed to predefined locations, but mechanical complexity increases due to actuators required for each divert

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveautomated sortationVSAvoidmechanical complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent removes the complex actuator mechanisms from each divert location and extracts only the essential function of routing objects. Instead of active tilt trays with motors, the system uses passive gravity-fed chutes and simple gates that redirect objects based on their destination, eliminating the need for powered actuators at each sortation point.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The invention replaces the mechanical actuator-based tilt tray system with a gravity-based passive diversion system. Objects are routed using gravity flow through chutes and simple mechanical gates rather than powered tilting mechanisms, substituting complex mechanical actuation with simpler gravitational forces.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Adaptability or versatility

If a large number of collection bins are deployed to handle diverse object types, then sortation capability increases, but physical space requirements and capital costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesortation capabilityVSAvoidphysical space
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSArea of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements collection bins that can be dynamically assigned to different destinations through software control rather than having dedicated bins for each destination. A single physical bin can serve multiple destinations at different times, allowing the system to handle diverse object types with fewer physical bins, thereby reducing space requirements while maintaining high sortation capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system employs dynamic destination assignment where collection bin mappings are not fixed but can be reconfigured based on current sortation needs. This dynamic flexibility allows the same physical infrastructure to adapt to varying sortation requirements, maximizing the utilization of limited bin resources and reducing the total number of bins needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Ease of operation

If fixed sequence operations are used in distribution centers, then process control is simplified, but system flexibility to accommodate varying objects is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocess controlVSAvoidsystem flexibility
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces a software-based routing dimension that operates independently of the physical conveyor sequence. While objects move through the facility in a fixed physical path, the system dynamically assigns virtual routing instructions that determine which collection bin each object should be directed to, adding a layer of flexibility without disrupting the underlying fixed operational sequence.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Solution Approach 2:

The system maintains fixed physical operational parameters (conveyor paths, station locations) while dynamically changing the routing parameters (destination assignments, bin mappings). This separation allows the physical infrastructure to remain simple and controlled while the software parameters adapt to handle varying object types and sortation requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS12195274B2Mobile carriers for use in systems and methods for processing objects including mobile matrix carrier systems
Publication Date: 2025.01.14 BERKSHIRE GREY OPERATING CO INC
  • US12195274B2 patent drawing
  • US12195274B2 patent drawing
  • US12195274B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An automated carrier system is disclosed for moving objects to be processed. The automated carrier system includes a base structure of a carrier on which an object may be supported, and at least two wheels mounted to at least two motors to provide at least two wheel assemblies, the at least two wheel assemblies being pivotally supported on the base structure for pivoting movement from a first position to a second position to effect a change in direction of movement of the carrier.