Pivoting Wheel Mobile Carriers for Orthogonal Grid Sortation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current object processing systems, such as sortation and automated storage and retrieval systems, face inefficiencies and inflexibilities due to the need for a large number of collection bins and high mechanical complexity, leading to increased costs and limited throughput in handling objects of varying sizes and weights.

Innovation Solution

An automated carrier system with pivotally mounted wheels allows for orthogonal movement on a track system, enabling efficient navigation and distribution of objects across a grid without requiring extensive reorientation of the carrier, thus reducing the need for multiple bins and complex divert mechanisms.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Extent of automation

If recirculating conveyors with tilt trays are used for automated sortation, then automation extent is improved, but device complexity increases due to actuators required for each divert

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveautomation of sortationVSAvoidmechanical complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts the actuator mechanism from each individual divert location and replaces it with passive gravity-fed chutes. Objects are diverted by their physical trajectory and gravity rather than active mechanical tilting at each station, eliminating the need for numerous actuators while maintaining automated sortation capability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the mechanical tilt-tray actuation system with a gravity-based passive sortation system. Instead of using motorized actuators to tilt trays at each divert location, objects are routed through gravity-fed pathways and chutes that direct items to collection bins without active mechanical intervention at divert points

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Adaptability or versatility

If a large number of collection bins are deployed to handle diverse objects, then adaptability is improved, but area occupied increases significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenumber of divertsVSAvoidphysical space
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSArea of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transitions from a linear horizontal arrangement of collection bins to a three-dimensional vertical stacking configuration. Multiple collection bins are stacked vertically at each divert location, allowing the system to handle a large number of different object types without proportionally increasing the horizontal footprint of the sortation system

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements nested collection bins where smaller bins are placed inside larger bins or on top of each other in vertical stacks. This nesting arrangement maximizes the number of collection bins that can be accommodated within a compact spatial envelope, reducing the overall area required while maintaining high adaptability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #7Nested doll (Nesting)

3Adaptability or versatility

If discrete trays with actuators are used for each divert, then number of diverts is improved, but manufacturing cost increases due to high cost per divert

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenumber of divertsVSAvoidcost per divert
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces expensive, complex actuated tilt trays with simple, low-cost passive divert structures such as gravity chutes and fixed pathways. These simpler components are much cheaper to manufacture and install, reducing the cost per divert location while still enabling a large number of divert points throughout the system

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs universal passive divert structures that can be replicated across multiple locations without requiring custom actuated mechanisms for each. The gravity-fed chutes and standardized pathways serve multiple divert functions simultaneously, reducing overall system cost while maintaining high adaptability to handle diverse object types

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

4Device complexity

If human workers perform manual sortation, then device complexity is reduced, but productivity is limited by worker speed

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem simplicityVSAvoidthroughput
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent incorporates preliminary automated identification and routing decisions before objects reach manual sortation points. Scanners and control systems pre-determine the destination of each object and prepare the appropriate divert pathways in advance, allowing human workers to focus solely on the physical placement action rather than decision-making, thereby maintaining simplicity while increasing throughput

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS11148890B2Mobile carriers for use in systems and methods for processing objects including mobile matrix carrier systems
Publication Date: 2021.10.19 BERKSHIRE GREY OPERATING CO INC
  • US11148890B2 patent drawing
  • US11148890B2 patent drawing
  • US11148890B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An automated carrier system is disclosed for moving objects to be processed. The automated carrier system includes a base structure of a carrier on which an object may be supported, and at least two wheels mounted to at least two motors to provide at least two wheel assemblies, the at least two wheel assemblies being pivotally supported on the base structure for pivoting movement from a first position to a second position to effect a change in direction of movement of the carrier.