Pixel Data Filling in Remote Sensing Images

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing image processing techniques fail to accurately fill in or replace missing pixel data in aerial and satellite images, often resulting in poorly corrected images due to mechanical failures or obstructions like clouds and shadows.

Innovation Solution

A method that aligns and re-samples source and target images to match resolution, classifies pixel data, and applies scaling factors to fill in or replace missing data from a source image captured at a different time or with a different imaging system, ensuring accurate representation of the terrain.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If pixel duplication techniques are used to fill in missing pixel data, then the correction process is simple and fast, but the image quality and accuracy of the corrected regions deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecorrection speedVSAvoidimage accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the image processing task by separating the correction process into multiple stages: identifying missing pixel regions, selecting source pixels from surrounding areas, and applying weighted averaging rather than simple duplication. This segmentation allows each stage to be optimized independently, improving overall accuracy while maintaining reasonable processing speed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies local quality by using spatially varying correction methods. Instead of a uniform approach, it selects source pixels from local neighborhoods around each missing pixel and applies weighted averaging where weights depend on the spatial relationship and similarity of pixels. This ensures that each region is corrected according to its local characteristics, improving accuracy without requiring globally complex processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Measurement precision

If complex image processing techniques are applied to fill in missing pixel data, then image accuracy improves, but the processing complexity and computational resources required increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimage accuracyVSAvoidprocessing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies partial action by focusing computational resources only on regions with missing pixel data rather than processing the entire image. It identifies and corrects only the affected areas using targeted pixel selection and weighted averaging, achieving high accuracy in corrected regions while avoiding unnecessary computation in already-valid areas, thus balancing accuracy with processing complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses copying by selecting source pixels from existing valid regions and copying their values (with weighting) to fill missing pixels. Rather than generating new data through complex reconstruction algorithms, it intelligently copies from proven good pixels, simplifying the processing while maintaining accuracy through careful selection and weighting of source pixels.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

3Ease of manufacture

If pixel data from neighboring pixels are assumed to be similar, then the correction method is simple to implement, but the corrected image quality deteriorates due to poor approximation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimplementation simplicityVSAvoidapproximation quality
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the parameter of pixel similarity by introducing weighted averaging instead of assuming uniform similarity. It calculates weights based on spatial distance and spectral similarity, transforming the simple assumption into a refined parameter-based approach. This maintains implementation feasibility while dramatically improving approximation quality through mathematically grounded weighting schemes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent incorporates feedback by evaluating the similarity between source pixels and target pixels, then using this evaluation to adjust the weighting in the averaging process. Pixels that are more similar contribute more to the correction, while less similar pixels contribute less. This feedback mechanism ensures high approximation quality while keeping the implementation straightforward through iterative refinement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS8705887B2Method and apparatus for filling in or replacing image pixel data
Publication Date: 2014.04.22 WEYERHAEUSER NR CO
  • US8705887B2 patent drawing
  • US8705887B2 patent drawing
  • US8705887B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A system for filling in and/or replacing pixel data in a target image uses pixel data from a source image. In one embodiment, the pixel data in the source image are classified and boundaries of local class areas or groups of similarly classified pixels are determined. The pixel data in the local class areas are compared to determine one or more scaling factors. The missing pixel data or data to be replaced in the target image is obtained from the source image and scaled with the one or more scaling factors.