Pixel Matrix Peep-Proof Sub-Pixel Arrangement

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current display apparatuses with peep-proof functions face challenges in achieving effective peep-proof effects while minimizing the use of optical films, which are expensive and increase the thickness of the display module, leading to reduced display quality and wide viewing angle luminance.

Innovation Solution

A display apparatus with a pixel matrix comprising 12 sub-pixels arranged in a matrix, including first, second, and third color sub-pixels, and a sub-pixel rendering unit using wide and narrow viewing angle gamma lookup tables to adjust performance values for sub-pixels, allowing for peep-proof display without additional optical films.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If optical films (light control film, prism film, diffuser) are added to achieve peep-proof function, then peep-proof capability is improved, but device complexity and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepeep-proof capabilityVSAvoidoptical film combination
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts the peep-proof function from the optical film layer and relocates it to the pixel arrangement structure. By arranging sub-pixels in specific patterns (e.g., alternating color patterns like RGBRGB or RRBBGG in 2x2 blocks) and controlling their emission characteristics, the peep-proof effect is achieved directly from the pixel matrix without requiring additional optical films.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the mechanical/optical film-based peep-proof solution with an electronic/pixel-control-based solution. Instead of using physical optical films to block or redirect light, the system uses electronic control of individual sub-pixel emission to create directional light distribution and achieve peep-proof effects through software-driven pixel rendering.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Reliability

If optical films are added to achieve peep-proof function, then peep-proof capability is improved, but display quality and wide viewing angle luminance deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepeep-proof capabilityVSAvoidwide viewing angle luminance
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSIllumination intensity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies different emission characteristics to different sub-pixels within the same pixel unit. By assigning specific colors and emission intensities to individual sub-pixels based on their position and the desired viewing angle, the system achieves directional light control (peep-proof) while maintaining high luminance in the intended viewing direction. Each sub-pixel is optimized for its specific role in the overall display performance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Reliability

If optical films are added to achieve peep-proof function, then peep-proof capability is improved, but manufacturing cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepeep-proof capabilityVSAvoidmanufacturing cost
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses software-based pixel rendering to create virtual optical effects that replace physical optical films. By copying and adapting the peep-proof function from optical film behavior into software control algorithms that manipulate pixel emission patterns, the system achieves the same functional effect without the cost of expensive optical film materials and their associated lamination and alignment processes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

4Reliability

If optical films are added to achieve peep-proof function, then peep-proof capability is improved, but display module thickness increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepeep-proof capabilityVSAvoiddisplay module thickness
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLength of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts the peep-proof function from the optical film layer and relocates it to the pixel arrangement structure. By arranging sub-pixels in specific patterns (e.g., alternating color patterns like RGBRGB or RRBBGG in 2x2 blocks) and controlling their emission characteristics, the peep-proof effect is achieved directly from the pixel matrix without requiring additional optical films.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Data Source

PatentUS10204573B2Pixel matrix and display method thereof
Publication Date: 2019.02.12 AU OPTRONICS CORP
  • US10204573B2 patent drawing
  • US10204573B2 patent drawing
  • US10204573B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A pixel matrix having a plurality of pixel units. Each pixel unit has at least 12 sub-pixels arranged in matrix manner. The pixel unit has at least 4 first color sub-pixels, at least 4 second color sub-pixels, and at least 4 third color sub-pixels. Each two of the first color sub-pixels are arranged adjacent to each other to form at least 2 first color sub-pixel pairs, and the first color sub-pixel pairs are separately provided in different columns and different rows of the pixel unit. Each two of the second color sub-pixels are arranged adjacent to each other to form at least 2 second color sub-pixel pairs, and the second color sub-pixel pairs are separately provided in different columns and different rows of the pixel unit. Each first color sub-pixel pair and each second color sub-pixel pair are arranged adjacent to each other in a column direction.