Imaging Apparatus Pixel Size Adjustment for Multi-Pitch Array Inspection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional imaging apparatus struggle to inspect multiple array regions on semiconductor wafers or reticles with different cell sizes simultaneously, leading to compromised throughput and defect detection sensitivity due to the need for multiple imaging scans and digital interpolation.

Innovation Solution

Selecting an optimal pixel size that allows for grouped cells with an integer number of pixels across all array regions, reducing the need for digital interpolation and maintaining high throughput by adjusting the pixel size through optical zoom, and determining this optimal size using the largest common divider and adjustable range considerations.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If multiple imaging scans are performed to inspect array regions with different cell sizes, then inspection coverage is improved, but throughput is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinspection coverageVSAvoidthroughput
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts the pixel size parameter of the imaging apparatus to match different array region specifications. By changing the pixel size within an optimal range, the system can inspect multiple array regions with different cell sizes using a single imaging scan, thereby maintaining high throughput while ensuring complete inspection coverage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The imaging apparatus incorporates dynamic pixel size adjustment capability, allowing the system to adapt to different array region requirements in real-time. This dynamic parameter adjustment enables the system to handle variable array configurations without requiring multiple separate scanning operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Measurement precision

If digital interpolation is used to handle non-integer cell sizes, then inspection capability is improved, but noise increases and sensitivity decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinspection capabilityVSAvoidnoise
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system adjusts the pixel size parameter to achieve an optimal match with array cell sizes, minimizing the need for digital interpolation. By selecting pixel sizes from an optimal range that produces integer or near-integer relationships with cell dimensions, the system maintains high defect detection sensitivity while avoiding the noise amplification associated with extensive interpolation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Measurement precision

If pixel size is adjusted to match specific array region sizes, then measurement precision is improved, but adaptability to different array configurations is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemeasurement precisionVSAvoidadaptability
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system maintains an optimal pixel size range rather than a fixed pixel size, allowing flexible adaptation to different array configurations. Within this range, the system can select appropriate pixel sizes for different array regions while maintaining measurement precision, thereby achieving both precision and adaptability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The imaging apparatus is designed with multi-functional capability to handle various array region configurations using a single imaging scan. The pixel size adjustment mechanism provides universal applicability across different array types, eliminating the need for specialized scanning procedures for each array configuration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

4Measurement precision

If multiple separate imaging scans are used for different array regions, then inspection accuracy is maintained, but inspection time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinspection accuracyVSAvoidinspection time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system merges multiple imaging scans into a single comprehensive scan by dynamically adjusting the pixel size to accommodate all array regions simultaneously. This consolidation maintains inspection accuracy for all array regions while significantly reducing the total inspection time required.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs continuous inspection of all array regions in a single uninterrupted imaging scan. By eliminating the need to switch between multiple scanning operations, the system maintains continuous useful action throughout the inspection process, thereby reducing inspection time while preserving accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Data Source

PatentUS8692878B2Methods and apparatus for simultaneously inspecting multiple array regions having different pitches
Publication Date: 2014.04.08 KLA CORP
  • US8692878B2 patent drawing
  • US8692878B2 patent drawing
  • US8692878B2 patent drawing

AI summary

One embodiment relates to a method of automatically inspecting multiple array regions (102) simultaneously using an imaging apparatus (302). The method includes selecting (211 or 212) an optimal pixel size such that each array region in the multiple array regions has a grouped cell which is an integer number of pixels in size, and adjusting a pixel size of the imaging apparatus to be the selected optimal pixel size. Optimal pixel sizes within an available range of pixel sizes may be determined by finding (202) a largest common divider of cell sizes of the multiple array regions when the cell sizes are expressed in integers. Pre-set criteria may be applied to determine (208) which, if any, of the optimal pixel sizes are acceptable based on pre-set criteria. If none of the optimal pixel sizes are acceptable, then one of the array regions may be marked for digital interpolation (see 216). Other embodiments, aspects, and features are also disclosed.