Automated Pizza Production System with Sorting and Self-Service Topping

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional pizza shops face increased waiting times and quality issues due to limited customization options and availability of ingredients, leading to customer dissatisfaction and potential revenue loss.

Innovation Solution

A semi-automated system that includes an automated selection station, preparation station, topping stations with customer involvement, cooking station, and delivery station, featuring a sorting device to direct dough portions to either a worker or a customer-accessible ingredient selection counter, allowing for personalized preparation and efficient production.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If a manual pizza preparation system is used with limited staff, then operational simplicity is maintained, but waiting times increase substantially during peak periods

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproduction speedVSAvoidcustomer waiting time
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The pizza production process is divided into distinct automated stations: dough preparation station, topping station, baking station, and delivery station. Each station performs a specific function independently, allowing parallel processing of multiple pizzas simultaneously, thereby increasing productivity without requiring proportional increases in staff.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system enables customers to select their own pizza toppings and customize their orders through an automated interface. The robotic system then autonomously prepares, assembles, and delivers the pizzas without requiring manual intervention from staff during the preparation process, significantly reducing waiting times.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Adaptability or versatility

If personalized topping selection is allowed, then customer satisfaction improves, but the complexity of ingredient management and selection process increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecustomization optionsVSAvoidingredient management complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The topping station is designed with a universal dispensing mechanism that can handle multiple types of ingredients (cheeses, meats, vegetables, sauces) through a single automated system. The robotic arm can switch between different ingredient containers and apply various toppings according to customer preferences, providing extensive customization without requiring separate manual stations for each ingredient type.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

An automated control system acts as an intermediary between the customer's topping selection and the physical ingredient dispensing. The system receives digital input from the customer interface, translates it into specific dispensing instructions, and coordinates the robotic arm to retrieve and apply the correct ingredients, thereby simplifying ingredient management while maintaining high customization capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Reliability

If more staff are hired to handle peak periods, then service quality can be maintained, but operational costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveservice quality consistencyVSAvoidsystem automation complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Manual mechanical operations (dough handling, topping application, pizza transfer) are replaced with an automated robotic system. The robotic arm performs precise movements to prepare and assemble pizzas consistently, while automated conveyors transport trays between stations. This substitution eliminates variability in service quality while reducing the need for additional staff during peak periods.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system incorporates sensors and control systems that continuously monitor the production process. Weight sensors verify ingredient portions, temperature sensors monitor baking conditions, and position sensors ensure accurate pizza placement. This feedback mechanism maintains consistent service quality by automatically adjusting parameters to meet predetermined standards, replacing the need for manual quality control by additional staff.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS10709142B2System and method for the personalized production of foods
Publication Date: 2020.07.14 GLOBAL ECO SRL
  • US10709142B2 patent drawing
  • US10709142B2 patent drawing
  • US10709142B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A system for the personalized production of foods including an automated selection station of the type of food requested by the customer, including the relative topping, and of the method of preparation thereof, a preparation station of the dough portions (P) that constitute the base of the requested foods (X,X′), a first topping station of the dough portions (P) with ingredients to be cooked, a cooking station of the dough portions (P) with ingredients to be cooked, a delivery station to the customer of the finished foods (X′), means (IS) for transporting the dough portions (P) and/or the foods (X,X′) through the stations. The first topping station includes a counter with worker and a selection counter of the ingredients to be cooked freely accessible to the customers; the transportation means include a sorting device of the dough portions (P) towards the counter with worker or towards the selection counter.