Planar Expandable Structure via Tessellation Hinges

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing three-dimensional movable structures are complex, energy-intensive, and costly, with limited design types and stability issues, making them unsuitable for universal and systematic applications.

Innovation Solution

A method for generating a planar expandable structure by adding hinged points and hinged rods based on uniform tessellation, utilizing geometric tessellation principles and duality principles to create a systematic and innovative design.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If three-dimensional folding or rotation mechanisms are used to create movable structures, then the structures can achieve dynamic changes and movement, but the structure becomes complex, occupies large space, requires many driving mechanisms, consumes much energy, and has high construction and operation costs

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovemovabilityVSAvoidstructural complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transitions from three-dimensional folding mechanisms to two-dimensional planar expansion mechanisms. By changing the dimensional approach from 3D rotation to 2D tessellation-based expansion, the structure achieves movability through a fundamentally different geometric principle that reduces complexity and space requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Solution Approach 2:

The structure is divided into multiple identical basic units that can be systematically arranged through tessellation. Each basic unit contains the necessary hinged points and rods, allowing the entire structure to be constructed from repeating modular elements rather than complex custom components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Ease of operation

If three-dimensional folding or rotation mechanisms are used, then dynamic changes can be achieved, but the construction and operation costs increase and stability decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedynamic capabilityVSAvoidstability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of using rotation mechanisms that pivot around points, the patent inverts the approach by using expansion mechanisms that radiate from central points. The hinged rods expand outward from hinged points in a planar configuration, fundamentally inverting the traditional rotational paradigm to achieve both stability and dynamic capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

Solution Approach 2:

The geometric constraints of the tessellation pattern and hinged connections provide inherent structural stability without requiring additional bracing or stabilization mechanisms. The structure's own geometry and connection system serve to maintain stability during expansion and contraction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Ease of operation

If three-dimensional movable structures are used, then movement is achieved, but the design types are limited and the system is not universal or systematic

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovemovabilityVSAvoiddesign variety
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent creates a universal design system based on planar uniform tessellation that can generate a wide variety of structures by changing the basic unit configuration. The same fundamental principles apply across different designs, making the system universally applicable while allowing for diverse outcomes through parameter variation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The design system allows for variation in parameters such as the number of basic units, the configuration of hinged points, and the arrangement of rods within each unit. By changing these parameters while maintaining the fundamental tessellation-based expansion mechanism, a wide range of design types can be generated from a single systematic approach.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS12314637B2Method for generating planar expandable structure by adding hinged points and hinged rods
Publication Date: 2025.05.27 ZHEJIANG UNIV
  • US12314637B2 patent drawing
  • US12314637B2 patent drawing
  • US12314637B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The present disclosure discloses a systematic method for generating a planar expandable structure by adding hinged points and hinged rods based on uniform tessellation, including: establishing a database of planar uniform tessellation graphs; selecting, inputting a graph of arbitrarily size range, naming it Graph A; drawing a dual tessellation graph of the Graph A, and extracting a basic unit b from it; determining whether the basic unit b has rotational symmetry, if not, then expanding the basic unit b to adjacent units, and denoting a final combined unit as Graph C; choosing to add hinged points or hinged rods, adjusting a length of each side of the Graph C, making Graph C′; adding original tessellation polygons in the Graph A to corresponding angular points of the Graph C′, rotating at a predetermined angle; hinging adjacent polygons by the hinged points or hinged rods together to obtain an expandable structural unit.