Planar optical module for tracking and collimating incident light

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional Concentrated Photovoltaic (CPV) systems require complex and energy-intensive tracking mechanisms to follow the sun's movement, leading to increased costs, size, and energy waste, as they need to be constantly oriented towards the light source due to the etendue limitation, which restricts their efficiency and suitability for residential installations.

Innovation Solution

A planar optical module with movable optical arrangements that converge and collimate incident light into discrete, concentrated beams with a fixed orientation, allowing for wide angular acceptance without the need for active sun tracking, enabling the use of existing concentrating optics and reducing the risk of optical obstruction.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If conventional CPV systems use active sun tracking by rotating the concentrator panel, then the concentration factor is improved, but the device complexity and energy consumption increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconcentration factorVSAvoidtracking mechanism complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of rotating the concentrator panel to track the sun, the patent inverts the approach by keeping the panel fixed and rotating the PV cell assembly. This reversal simplifies the tracking mechanism while maintaining the ability to follow solar movement, resolving the contradiction between concentration factor and device complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent segments the CPV system into two independent rotatable components: the concentrator panel and the PV cell assembly. This segmentation allows each component to be optimized independently - the panel can be large and fixed while the smaller PV assembly handles the tracking rotation, reducing overall system complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Productivity

If conventional CPV systems use active sun tracking by rotating the concentrator panel, then the concentration factor is improved, but the energy consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconcentration factorVSAvoidtracking energy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent inverts the tracking approach by keeping the concentrator panel fixed and rotating only the PV cell assembly. This reduces the mass that needs to be moved and the energy required for tracking, while maintaining the concentration factor through the same optical geometry

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies local quality by making only the necessary portion of the system (the PV cell assembly) rotatable, rather than rotating the entire large concentrator panel. This localized rotation minimizes energy consumption while maintaining tracking functionality

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Ease of operation

If conventional CPV systems use wide acceptance angles to cover sun position variations, then the ease of operation is improved, but the concentration factor decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveangular acceptanceVSAvoidconcentration factor
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies dynamics by making the PV cell assembly rotatable, which allows the system to actively adapt to changing sun positions. This dynamic adjustment enables the use of narrow acceptance angles while maintaining high concentration factors, as the system actively tracks rather than relying on passive wide-angle acceptance

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This solution enhances the concentration factor and reduces the lateral extent of the output light beams, enabling higher efficiency and flexibility in design, while maintaining a fixed orientation independent of the incident light direction, thus overcoming the limitations of existing CPV systems.

Implementation Method 1

a first optical arrangement with at least one optical layer able to converge the incident light beam, forming thereby at least one converging light beam

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectRefraction: Refraction

Implementation Method 2

a second optical arrangement placed downstream the first optical arrangement, said second optical arrangement having at least one optical layer able to collimate said converging light beam(s), forming thereby at least one output light beam

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectRefraction: Refraction

Data Source

PatentEP3378103B1Planar optical module for tracking and collimating incident light
Publication Date: 2020.03.25 INSOLIGHT SA
  • EP3378103B1 patent drawingFigure 1A~2B
  • EP3378103B1 patent drawingFigure 3A~4
  • EP3378103B1 patent drawingFigure 5~6

AI summary

Planar optical module (100, 100') for capturing, converging and collimating incident light (3, 3') with a variable incident direction comprising: - a first optical arrangement (10) with an optical layer able to converge the incident light-beam (3, 3'), forming thereby a converging light-beam (4, 4') and - a second optical arrangement (20) placed downstream said first optical arrangement (10), said second optical arrangement (20) having an optical layer collimating said converging light-beam(s) (4, 4'), forming thereby a collimated and concentrated beam (5, 5'), wherein the first and second optical arrangements (10, 20) are movable one relative to the other such that the relative position of first and second optical arrangements (10, 20) allows said collimated and concentrated beam (5, 5') to have an orientation which is, in a plane perpendicular to the main plane (P) of the planar optical module (100, 100'), predetermined, fixed and independent from the direction of the incident light (3, 3'). Preferentially, the first optical arrangement (10) comprises two optical layers (11, 12) movable one relative to the other, the second optical arrangement (20) comprises either an optical layer formed by one or a plurality of reflective elements (26, 27) having a concave surface or comprises only one optical layer with variable refractive- index elements (23) or with fluorescent dyes (25).