Planar and Tri-Gate Transistor Integration on Substrate

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing SRAM cell designs face complexity and difficulty in patterning and etching due to varying diffusion and gate electrode widths and lengths, leading to increased mask complexity and etching challenges, especially in sub-100 nm technologies.

Innovation Solution

Integrating different types of transistors, such as planar and tri-gate transistors, on the same substrate with substantially uniform diffusion and gate electrode widths, allowing for varying transistor strengths without the need for complex jog structures, thereby simplifying lithography patterning and reducing SRAM cell area.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If diffusion and gate electrode widths are varied to achieve different transistor strengths, then transistor strength control is improved, but patterning and etching complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetransistor strength controlVSAvoidpatterning and etching complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by creating different transistor strengths not through varying diffusion widths, but through localized changes in gate electrode length. Each transistor type (pass-gate, pull-down, pull-up) receives a specific gate length tailored to its function, while all transistors share the same uniform diffusion width W. This allows independent optimization of each transistor's strength characteristics without affecting the uniformity of the diffusion structure across the substrate.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent segments the transistor strength control parameter into gate length H rather than using diffusion width W. By separating the control mechanism, the diffusion region can maintain uniform width for simplified patterning, while the gate electrode length is independently adjusted for each transistor type to achieve the required strength variations. This segmentation resolves the contradiction between uniformity and differentiation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Adaptability or versatility

If diffusion width is varied to control transistor strength, then transistor strength adjustment is improved, but mask complexity and lithography difficulty increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetransistor strength adjustmentVSAvoidlithography patterning precision
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The invention applies local quality by maintaining uniform diffusion width W across all transistors for simplified lithography patterning, while achieving different transistor strengths through localized variations in gate electrode length H. This approach eliminates the need for complex mask designs required for variable width diffusions, as the uniform diffusion can be patterned with standard lithography techniques.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

Instead of varying diffusion width to control transistor strength (conventional approach), the patent inverts the control mechanism by varying gate length while keeping diffusion width constant. This inversion simplifies the lithography process for the diffusion region, as uniform width features are easier to pattern with high precision than variable width features requiring jog structures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

3Adaptability or versatility

If jog structures are used to vary diffusion width, then transistor strength control is improved, but SRAM cell area increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetransistor strength controlVSAvoidSRAM cell area
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSArea of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent achieves local quality in transistor strength control through gate length variation rather than diffusion width variation. This eliminates the need for jog structures in the diffusion regions, allowing for more compact and efficient layout of the SRAM cell. The uniform diffusion width enables tighter packing of transistor components, reducing the overall cell area.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent moves the strength control parameter from the lateral dimension (diffusion width) to the longitudinal dimension (gate length). By controlling transistor strength through gate length H rather than diffusion width W, the design achieves the required differentiation without the area-penalty jog structures that would be needed to create variable width diffusions in the lateral direction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Data Source

PatentUS8058690B2Integration of planar and tri-gate devices on the same substrate
Publication Date: 2011.11.15 INTEL CORP
  • US8058690B2 patent drawing
  • US8058690B2 patent drawing
  • US8058690B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An apparatus including a first diffusion formed on a substrate, the first diffusion including a pair of channels, each of which separates a source from a drain; a second diffusion formed on the substrate, the second diffusion including a channel that separates a source from a drain; a first gate electrode formed on the substrate, wherein the first gate electrode overlaps one of the pair of channels on the first diffusion to form a pass-gate transistor; and a second gate electrode formed on the substrate, wherein the second gate electrode overlaps one of the pair of channels of the first diffusion to form a pull-down transistor and overlaps the channel of the second diffusion to form a pull-up transistor, and wherein the pass-gate, pull-down and pull-up transistors are of at least two different constructions. Other embodiments are disclosed and claimed.