Planetary Gear Tooth Geometry for Tip Interference Verification

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Planetary gear systems face catastrophic failures due to tooth breakage and fatigue, leading to potential disasters in critical applications like aircraft propulsion, as existing methods fail to effectively prevent tooth tip interference and accommodate rim unfurling, which can cause destructive meshing and load redistribution issues.

Innovation Solution

A method to verify and prevent tooth tip interference in planetary gear systems by designing and optimizing the tooth length and base pitch of planet, ring, and sun gears to accommodate rim unfurling, using geometric and kinematic considerations, and employing chip detection systems to monitor and manage the load redistribution.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If conventional planetary gear systems are used without specialized design features, then the structure is simpler and manufacturing is easier, but tooth tip interference occurs leading to catastrophic failure

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprevention of catastrophic failureVSAvoidgear design complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by performing a verification method before actual operation to detect potential tooth tip interference. The method calculates interference factors and determines whether tooth tips will interfere with mating gears under various operating conditions, allowing design adjustments to be made beforehand to prevent catastrophic failure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces physical prototyping and testing with a computational verification system. By using mathematical models to calculate interference factors based on gear geometry, load conditions, and material properties, the system substitutes mechanical trial-and-error with analytical prediction, reducing the need for multiple physical iterations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Strength

If tooth length and base pitch are optimized to accommodate rim unfurling, then non-destructive meshing is achieved, but design and manufacturing become more complex

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresistance to tooth breakageVSAvoidtooth geometry precision
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The verification method allows tooth length and base pitch to be optimized in advance by calculating the interference factor for different geometric configurations. This preliminary analysis identifies the optimal dimensions that accommodate rim unfurling without causing tooth tip interference, enabling precise manufacturing specifications to be established before production.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent systematically varies geometric parameters such as tooth length, base pitch, and pressure angle to find optimal values that prevent tooth tip interference. By changing these parameters and evaluating their effect on the interference factor, the method identifies combinations that provide adequate strength while maintaining manufacturability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If verification methods are implemented to detect tooth tip interference, then reliability improves, but the design process takes longer

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection of interference conditionsVSAvoidverification process time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces time-consuming physical testing with computational verification. By using mathematical models to calculate interference factors based on gear geometry and operating conditions, the method provides rapid assessment of potential interference issues without requiring actual assembly and testing of gear sets.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The verification method is integrated into the early design phase, allowing interference issues to be detected and resolved before final manufacturing. This preliminary detection prevents later redesigns and testing iterations, ultimately reducing the total development time despite the additional verification steps.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentEP3779241B1Method for verifying whether tooth tip interference occurs in a planetary gear system
Publication Date: 2023.11.08 BELL HELICOPTER TEXTRON INC
  • EP3779241B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3779241B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3779241B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

A method of avoiding gear tooth interference in a planetary gear system (100) includes designing and building a planetary gear system (100) comprising a selected base pitch and tooth length for planet gears (106), breaking a rim (118) of one of the planet gears (106), and verifying whether tooth tip interference occurs during operation of the planetary gear system (100).