Plank Support Apparatus with Destabilizing Device for Injury Reduction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional plank exercise devices often lead to discomfort and injury due to unrestricted sliding movements, improper ergonomic handle grips, and concentrated force on the elbows, which can result in overextension and strain on the wrists and forearms.

Innovation Solution

A plank support exercise apparatus with adjustable hand grip and forearm support pads, a ground-interface surface, and a destabilizing device that allows controlled rotational movement, distributing the user's weight and providing ergonomic support to reduce strain on elbows and wrists.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If conventional plank exercise devices allow unrestricted sliding movement, then users can move freely during exercise, but users are highly susceptible to inadvertently overextending exercise positions which can result in injury

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemovement freedomVSAvoidinjury risk
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The device applies preliminary anti-action by providing controlled resistance to sliding movement through friction between the ground-interface surface and ground, and through the destabilizing device that creates rotational resistance. This pre-applied counter-force prevents users from inadvertently overextending positions by making the movement可控 (controllable) rather than unrestricted, thereby reducing injury risk while maintaining exercise effectiveness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #9Preliminary anti-action

Solution Approach 2:

The ground-interface surface acts as an intermediary between the device and the ground, mediating the interaction through its frictional properties. The destabilizing device serves as another intermediary that introduces controlled rotational resistance. These intermediaries transform the unrestricted sliding motion into controlled movement, allowing exercise freedom while preventing harmful overextension.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Device complexity

If conventional devices transfer bodyweight through the elbow to the ground, then the exercise structure is simple, but the localized force on the elbow causes discomfort and strain

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural simplicityVSAvoidelbow discomfort
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The device segments the force transfer path by introducing intermediate components (frame member, ground-interface surface, destabilizing device) between the elbow and ground. This segmentation distributes the localized elbow force across multiple contact points and structural elements, reducing the concentrated stress on the elbow while maintaining structural efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The device provides beforehand cushioning by positioning the ground-interface surface and destabilizing device to absorb and distribute forces before they reach the elbow. The frictional resistance and rotational control act as pre-applied cushioning forces that reduce the impact on the elbow joint during exercise.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #11Beforehand cushioning (Prior cushioning)

3Device complexity

If conventional handle grips are positioned aligned with or higher than the user's arm, then the device structure is simplified, but this results in upwards pitching of the user's wrist causing strain

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegrip positioning simplicityVSAvoidwrist strain
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The device applies local quality by specifically optimizing the hand grip positioning and orientation to address wrist ergonomics. The handle grips are positioned and angled to maintain neutral wrist alignment, creating a localized ergonomic solution that doesn't require complex overall restructuring of the device. This targeted adjustment eliminates wrist strain while keeping the rest of the device structure simple.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

4Reliability

If conventional devices provide stable support, then user safety is improved, but additional muscle groups are not engaged

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesupport stabilityVSAvoidmuscle engagement
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The device applies dynamics by introducing controlled instability through the destabilizing device that allows rotational movement. This transforms the static stable support into dynamic, controlled instability that challenges the user's balance and engages additional stabilizing muscle groups. The ground-interface surface provides sufficient friction to maintain safety while the rotational freedom enables enhanced muscle activation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS11491364B2Plank support exercise apparatus and related methods
Publication Date: 2022.11.08 DOMESICK MICHAEL HARRIS
  • US11491364B2 patent drawing
  • US11491364B2 patent drawing
  • US11491364B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A plank support exercise apparatus and related methods is provided. The plank support exercise apparatus has a frame and at least one arm support pad connected to the frame. A ground-interface surface is positioned along at least a portion of the apparatus.