Autonomous Vehicle Planner Interface for Seamless Control Handoffs
Find Innovative SolutionsGenerate Solutions
Solution Overview
Problem
Autonomous vehicles face challenges in managing and seamlessly transitioning between different planners, leading to inconsistent data streams and operational issues in vehicle controls, particularly during transitions and in degraded states.
Innovation Solution
A unified interface is introduced between the planning and control stacks to manage communications, ensuring a single data stream to the control stack, handle inconsistencies, and facilitate smooth transitions between planners, including primary and fallback managers.
Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles
Engineering Contradiction Analysis
1Adaptability or versatility
If multiple planners are used in the autonomous vehicle system, then the system's adaptability and functionality are improved, but the complexity of managing transitions between planners increases
Solution Approach 1:
A unified interface is introduced as an intermediary component between multiple planners and the control stack. This interface receives plans from different planners (e.g., primary planner, fallback planner), standardizes their data formats, and manages transitions seamlessly. The interface acts as a mediator that handles the complexity of coordinating multiple planners, allowing each planner to focus on its specific function while the interface ensures consistent data stream delivery to the control stack.
2Reliability
If seamless transitions between planners are implemented, then the reliability of vehicle operation is improved, but the complexity of the control system increases
Solution Approach 1:
The patent merges the transition management functionality into a unified interface that consolidates multiple planner outputs into a single standardized data stream. Instead of having separate transition management mechanisms for each planner pair, the system combines all planner communications through one interface that handles switching, validation, and data formatting. This merging approach improves reliability by ensuring consistent transition protocols while managing complexity through centralization.
3Stability of the object's composition
If a unified interface is introduced to manage multiple planners, then the consistency of data streams to the control stack is improved, but the complexity of the interface management increases
Solution Approach 1:
The unified interface enforces homogeneity by standardizing all planner output data streams into a common format and protocol. Regardless of which planner generates the plan (primary, fallback, or other specialized planners), the interface ensures that all data received by the control stack follows the same structure, validation rules, and communication protocols. This homogenization approach guarantees data stream consistency while the interface internally manages the complexity of adapting different planner formats to the standard.
Data Source
AI summary
Autonomous vehicles may have different specialized primary planners in the vehicle planning stack that each can generate a plan for the vehicle control stack. For instance, one primary planner may be used for the vehicle to drive forward, and another primary planner may be used for the vehicle to drive in reverse. Additionally, a fallback planner may be implemented to allow the autonomous vehicle to drive in a degraded state. A unified interface is provided between the planning stack and the control stack to manage communications between the different planners in the planning stack and the control stack.


