Planning Assessment System Using Multi-Dimensional Scoring

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Individuals face challenges in evaluating and implementing suitable financial and other-than-financial plans, as they often do not assess their current and future personal circumstances effectively, leading to incomplete or unexecuted planning.

Innovation Solution

A system and method that assesses financial and other-than-financial planning by presenting questions across multiple dimensions, scoring user responses, providing comparison scores, and offering resources and action items to improve planning suitability, with reminders to review and update plans.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Quantity of substance

If individuals perform financial and other-than-financial planning, then their planning coverage improves, but their ability to evaluate suitability and carry out plans deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveplanning coverageVSAvoidevaluation and implementation capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system provides automated feedback by comparing user responses against established criteria and peer benchmarks, generating suitability scores and actionable recommendations that guide users in evaluating and improving their planning without requiring expert knowledge

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system enables users to self-assess their planning suitability by answering questions and receiving automated evaluation results, eliminating the need for professional advisors while maintaining comprehensive assessment capabilities across multiple planning dimensions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Measurement precision

If the system provides comprehensive assessment across multiple dimensions, then evaluation accuracy improves, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveevaluation accuracyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The assessment system is divided into distinct dimensions (financial planning, career planning, relationship planning, personal growth, health and wellness) with specific criteria for each, allowing comprehensive evaluation while maintaining modularity and ease of implementation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses a unified assessment framework that covers multiple planning dimensions through a consistent question-and-score structure, enabling comprehensive evaluation across diverse areas without requiring separate complex systems for each dimension

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Productivity

If the system provides personalized resources and action items, then planning improvement effectiveness improves, but information processing requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveplanning improvement effectivenessVSAvoidinformation processing load
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The system provides tailored resources and action items specific to each user's identified needs and strengths across different planning dimensions, delivering customized information rather than generic content, which improves effectiveness while managing information load through relevance filtering

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS20240330892A1System and method for assisting individuals in assessing and improving their behavior regarding financial and other-than-financial planning based on their personal circumstances and assisting with implementing such plans
Publication Date: 2024.10.03 CHARLES SCHWAB & CO INC
  • US20240330892A1 patent drawing
  • US20240330892A1 patent drawing
  • US20240330892A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A system and method identifies a score for a user using the user's response to questions from a number of different financial and other-than-financial planning dimensions.