Plant Cutting Unit With Independent Height Adjustment

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing cutting devices for plants, particularly for beets, face issues with inconsistent cutting heights due to varying beet sizes, leading to unintentional displacement and inadequate contact, resulting in inefficient harvesting.

Innovation Solution

A cutting device with adjustable holding elements that allow independent adjustment relative to each other, independent of the cutting device frame, enabling precise cutting height control and force adjustment, using mechanisms like parallelogram guides and spring elements to maintain optimal sensing and cutting element alignment.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If manual cutting with scissors or hand shears is used, then the device is simple to operate, but it requires manual strength and is unsuitable for large numbers of plants

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecutting capacityVSAvoiddevice structure
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The cutting device is divided into distinct functional modules: a support unit with support members, a cutting unit with cutting members, and a drive unit with drive members. Each module performs a specific function, allowing the system to handle large numbers of plants efficiently while maintaining operational simplicity through modular design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The support members are configured to hold multiple plants simultaneously, and the cutting members are arranged to cut multiple plants in a single operation. This multi-functional capability allows the device to process large numbers of plants without requiring multiple separate cutting actions, thereby increasing productivity without proportionally increasing complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Productivity

If multiple cutting members are used to cut multiple plants, then productivity increases, but the device complexity and difficulty of cleaning increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenumber of plants cutVSAvoidcleaning ease
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The cutting members are designed to be easily removable from the cutting device. This extraction capability allows for simple cleaning and maintenance of multiple cutting members without requiring disassembly of the entire device, thereby maintaining ease of cleaning while enabling high productivity through multiple cutting members.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The support members and cutting members are configured to facilitate easy access and cleaning. The modular design with easily removable components allows the system to maintain itself through simple cleaning operations, reducing the complexity burden that would otherwise accompany multiple cutting members.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Productivity

If cutting members are positioned close together to cut multiple plants, then productivity increases, but plants may become entangled and cut incorrectly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecutting efficiencyVSAvoidcutting accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

Each cutting member is associated with specific support members that position individual plants at precise locations. This local quality control ensures that even though multiple cutting members operate in close proximity, each plant is held and cut at the correct position and orientation, preventing entanglement and ensuring accurate cutting while maintaining high productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

4Productivity

If a motor-driven system is used to automate cutting, then productivity increases, but the device complexity and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveautomation levelVSAvoidmechanism complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The drive members are configured to move the support members and cutting members in a coordinated dynamic motion. This dynamic system allows automation of the cutting process for high productivity while using simple mechanical motion patterns that can be driven by basic motors, thereby limiting the increase in device complexity despite the gain in automation and productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentEP4188064B1Cutting device for cutting plants
Publication Date: 2026.05.20 GRIMME LANDMASCHINENFABRIK SE & CO KG
  • EP4188064B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP4188064B1 patent drawingFigure 3~4
  • EP4188064B1 patent drawingFigure 5~6

AI summary

The invention relates to a cutting device (40) for cutting plants. The cutting device comprises at least one cutting unit (41) which has at least one probe element (21), fastened to a holding element (13), for determining an extent of a plant, at least one cutting element (22), fastened to a further holding element (11), for cutting the plant depending on the extent, and at least two frame coupling elements (4, 6). Here, at least one of the holding elements (11, 13) is coupled to a cutting device frame (1) by the frame coupling elements (4, 6). The holding elements (11, 13) are arranged movably relative to one another. The cutting device comprises an adjusting device (42) which is configured to adjust the holding elements (11, 13) relative to one another independently of a movement of at least one of the holding elements (11, 13) relative to the cutting device frame (1).