Plant Dehydration Ductwork for Low-Temperature Moisture Removal

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing dehydration methods for organic materials, such as cannabis, are inefficient at scale, often damaging the material's quality, require excessive energy, and risk microbial growth, while traditional methods like high-temperature drying and freeze drying are costly or ineffective in differentiating between free and bound water.

Innovation Solution

A controlled dehydration system with a housing structure and ductwork design that introduces low-temperature, low-humidity air to create a vapor pressure deficit, using recirculation and exhaust vents to efficiently remove free water while preserving bound water, maintaining product quality and preventing microbial growth.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If high air temperatures are used to draw out moisture, then dehydration efficiency is improved, but the organic material's desirable properties are damaged and energy consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedehydration efficiencyVSAvoiddamage to organic material properties
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the dehydration parameters from high temperature to low temperature operation, using temperatures below 70°F to remove moisture while preserving the organic material's desirable properties such as flavor, color, and aromatic compounds

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent utilizes the phase transition of water from liquid to vapor through controlled evaporation at low temperatures, creating a vapor pressure deficit that drives moisture removal without requiring high thermal energy input

Inventive Principle:
Principle #36Phase transitions

2Productivity

If high air temperatures are used to draw out moisture, then dehydration efficiency is improved, but energy consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedehydration efficiencyVSAvoidenergy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSUse of energy by stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent operates the dehydration system at low temperatures below 70°F, dramatically reducing the energy input required compared to traditional high-temperature drying methods while maintaining effective moisture removal through vapor pressure differential

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the thermal mechanism (heat-driven evaporation) with a vapor pressure differential mechanism, using cold dry air to create a gradient that drives moisture removal without requiring high energy input

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Reliability

If hang drying is used to maintain high humidity, then microbial growth is prevented, but drying time increases and space requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemicrobial growth preventionVSAvoiddrying time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the humidity parameter from high (50-55% in hang drying) to low (below 30% relative humidity), creating an environment that prevents microbial growth while accelerating the dehydration process through increased vapor pressure deficit

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements continuous air circulation through recirculation ducts and exhaust vents, maintaining constant movement of dry air through the chamber to continuously drive moisture removal and prevent stagnant conditions that could promote microbial growth

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

4Productivity

If hang drying is used, then space and labor requirements increase, but dehydration can be achieved

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedehydration capabilityVSAvoidspace requirements
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSArea of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses porous drying chambers with extensive surface area for air circulation, allowing efficient moisture removal in a compact space through optimized airflow patterns and recirculation systems

Inventive Principle:
Principle #31Porous materials

Solution Approach 2:

The patent transitions from three-dimensional hang drying space to a more compact chamber-based system with optimized internal airflow dimensions, reducing the overall space footprint while maintaining dehydration effectiveness

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The system effectively removes over 80% of free water from organic materials while preserving bound water, ensuring high product quality and weight, reducing energy consumption, and preventing microbial growth, thus maximizing commercial value.

Implementation Method 1

inflow of dry air into the drying chamber provides a temperature of below 70 degrees Fahrenheit and a relative humidity level of less than 30% in the air surrounding the hemp plants, and the relative humidity level results in a vapor pressure deficit in the air that causes free water to escape from the hemp plants

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectVapor pressure deficit: Vapour Pressure

Data Source

PatentUS12405059B2Systems and methods for plant dehydration
Publication Date: 2025.09.02 SHAWIN TECHNOLOGY GROUP INC
  • US12405059B2 patent drawing
  • US12405059B2 patent drawing
  • US12405059B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A system for dehydration of organic material comprises a housing structure having an interior chamber, a supply duct, a dual trunk structure, a dry air intake, a central recirculation duct, and a plurality of side recirculation ducts. The side recirculation ducts each have a return plenum extending downward from a top recirculation duct and are configured to recirculate interior air contained in the chamber. The interior air enters the side recirculation ducts through the return plenums and is pushed upward and outward through the top recirculation ducts and back into the interior chamber. The interior chamber has a plurality of exhaust vents positioned in the upper region of its walls. A plurality of portable platforms positioned inside the interior chamber are configured to hold the organic material. The floor of the housing structure can include a plurality of tracks for loading, unloading and positioning the portable platforms.