Multi-Head Plant Detection Model for Crop Automation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current agriculture automation systems face challenges in accurately detecting and classifying plants, especially in diverse crop environments with sparse or dense crop rows, and in handling visually distinct plants within the same taxonomy grouping.

Innovation Solution

A plant detection system utilizing a multi-head detection model with a backbone, classification model, and parallel task models that generate instance maps, plant class maps, and attribute maps, enabling real-time plant detection and localization across various crop densities and taxonomic groups.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If a single detection model is used for plant detection, then the device complexity is low, but the measurement precision and adaptability to diverse crop environments deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveplant detection accuracyVSAvoiddetection model complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The detection system is segmented into multiple specialized detection models, each trained to detect specific plant taxa or crop types. This segmentation allows each model to specialize in particular plant characteristics, improving overall detection precision while maintaining manageable complexity through modular architecture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements a universal detection framework that can handle multiple plant taxa and crop types through a collection of detection models. The framework provides unified interfaces for image input and result output, while internally routing to appropriate specialized models based on the detection task, achieving multi-functionality without proportionally increasing complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Measurement precision

If multiple specialized detection models are used for different plant taxa, then the measurement precision improves, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveplant classification accuracyVSAvoidnumber of detection models
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

An intermediary framework is introduced that manages the collection of specialized detection models. This framework handles model selection, coordinate transformation between different model outputs, and result aggregation, allowing multiple specialized models to work together seamlessly without requiring complex integration logic in each individual model.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system transforms the complexity management problem from the model dimension to the framework dimension. By organizing models in a structured framework with standardized interfaces and automatic routing, the system handles multiple specialized models efficiently, converting what would be chaotic complexity into organized, manageable structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

3Adaptability or versatility

If detection models are retrained for each new crop type, then the adaptability to new crops is achieved, but the loss of time for model retraining increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadaptability to new crop typesVSAvoidmodel retraining time
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

Detection models are pre-trained on comprehensive datasets covering multiple plant taxa and crop types during the development phase. This preliminary action equips the models with broad knowledge that can be quickly adapted to new crops through the framework's routing mechanisms, reducing the need for extensive retraining when encountering new crop types during deployment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system achieves adaptability to new crop types by changing operational parameters (which detection model to use, which taxonomy level to apply) rather than fundamentally retraining the underlying detection algorithms. This allows rapid adaptation through configuration changes instead of time-consuming retraining processes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS20250127072A1Crop detection system and/or method therefore
Publication Date: 2025.04.24 FARMWISE LABS INC
  • US20250127072A1 patent drawing
  • US20250127072A1 patent drawing
  • US20250127072A1 patent drawing

AI summary

The system can include a detection model; an optional camera system; and an optional control system. The system can function to detect plants within a field. Additionally, the system can function to facilitate an agriculture operation(s) based on the positions of plants within the field. Variants of the system can be configured to (autonomously) perform and/or facilitate agriculture operations which can include: agent dispersal (e.g., solid agent dispersal), fluid spraying, crop imaging (e.g., crop data collection), side dressing, weeding (e.g., mechanical actuation, targeted laser ablation, etc.), harvesting, planting, tilling, fertilizing, irrigating, and/or any other suitable operation(s). Variants of the system and/or method can be used to facilitate detection and/or agriculture operations for single crops, multi-crops (e.g., crop doubles, where agriculture operations may be based on stem proximity), ground cover plants, weeds, and/or agriculture operations in any other suitable scenarios.