Plant Management Apparatus Using Image Processing for Selective Weed and Insect Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current agricultural practices face challenges in managing weeds and insects in a way that balances chemical use reduction with biodiversity and yield optimization, as integrated weed management often requires eradication of weeds and control of pests, which can be contradictory to reducing chemical use and promoting beneficial insects.

Innovation Solution

An apparatus and method for plant management using image processing to differentiate between crop plants and weeds, and detect beneficial and detrimental insects, allowing for targeted application of chemical, mechanical, or electric control technologies to selectively control weeds and insects, thereby reducing chemical use and enhancing biodiversity.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If integrated weed management requires eradication of weeds and control of pests, then crop yield is improved, but chemical use increases and biodiversity decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecrop yieldVSAvoidchemical use
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies different control measures to different plants based on their species and characteristics. Image processing technology identifies individual weeds and crops, allowing selective application of control measures only where needed, rather than treating the entire field uniformly. This localized approach reduces overall chemical use while maintaining yield protection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The field management approach is segmented into individual plant-level decisions. Instead of applying blanket chemical treatment across the entire field, the system divides the field into discrete plant units, analyzes each plant's identity and status, and applies control measures selectively to specific weeds while leaving crops and beneficial plants untreated.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Productivity

If integrated weed management requires eradication of weeds, then crop yield is improved, but biodiversity decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecrop yieldVSAvoidbiodiversity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system recognizes and preserves beneficial plants and insects through localized identification and selective non-treatment. By using image processing to identify plant species and insect characteristics, the system applies control measures only to harmful weeds while allowing beneficial flora and fauna to thrive in their respective locations, thus maintaining biodiversity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

Image processing technology serves as an intermediary between the farmer and the field ecosystem. It enables differentiation between harmful and beneficial organisms, allowing the farmer to make informed decisions about which plants to control and which to preserve, thereby maintaining biodiversity while protecting crop yield.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Object-affected harmful factors

If farmers spray the crop with insecticide to control pest insects, then pest control is improved, but beneficial insects are harmed and chemical use increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepest controlVSAvoidchemical use
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies insecticide treatment selectively to individual plants or areas where pest insects are detected, rather than broadcasting chemicals across the entire field. Image processing identifies pest-infested plants and targets control measures precisely to those locations, minimizing overall chemical application while maintaining effective pest control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The field is segmented into individual plant units for pest management decisions. The system analyzes each plant for pest presence and applies insecticide only to infested plants, leaving plants without pests and areas with beneficial insects untreated, thereby reducing total chemical use while maintaining pest control effectiveness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

4Object-affected harmful factors

If farmers spray the crop with insecticide to control pest insects, then pest control is improved, but beneficial insects are harmed

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepest controlVSAvoidbiodiversity
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system identifies and protects beneficial insects through localized recognition of their presence and characteristics. By using image processing to distinguish between pest and beneficial insects at the individual plant level, the system applies insecticide only where pests are present and beneficial insects are absent, thereby maintaining pest control while preserving beneficial insect populations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

Image processing technology acts as an intermediary that enables differentiation between pest and beneficial insects. This allows the system to make selective treatment decisions that control pests while preserving beneficial insect populations, maintaining both pest control effectiveness and biodiversity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

5Productivity

If all weeds are controlled in the field, then crop yield is improved, but time and resources for weeding increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecrop yieldVSAvoidtime for weeding
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system identifies and controls only those weeds that pose a threat to crop yield, rather than treating all weeds uniformly. By using image processing to assess weed species, size, and location, the system applies control measures selectively to high-priority weeds, reducing the time and resources required for weeding while maintaining yield protection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The weeding process is segmented into priority-based categories. The system divides weeds into groups based on their potential impact on crop yield and applies control measures accordingly, focusing resources on the most problematic weeds first. This prioritized approach reduces overall weeding time and resource consumption while maintaining effective yield protection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS11373288B2Apparatus for plant management
Publication Date: 2022.06.28 BASF SE
  • US11373288B2 patent drawing
  • US11373288B2 patent drawing
  • US11373288B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The present invention relates to an apparatus for plant management. It is described to provide (210) a processing unit with at least one image of a field. The processing unit analyses (220) the at least one image to determine information relating to a plant that is present. The processing unit determines (230) if the plant is to be controlled or is not to be controlled by a plant control technology based on the information relating to the plant. An output unit outputs (240) information that is useable to activate at least one plant control technology if the determination is made that the plant is to be controlled by the plant control technology.