Plant Identification Model Self-Correction in Farming Machines

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Incorrect configuration of plant identification models in farming machines leads to suboptimal performance, causing damage to crops and ineffective weed control due to human error or miscommunication.

Innovation Solution

A method for identifying and remediating incorrectly configured plant identification models using a multi-layer performance evaluation system (MPAS) that includes a plant identification model and a verification model to determine the correct configuration, allowing for real-time adjustments and reconfiguration of the model parameters.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If a plant identification model is configured by operator input, then the system is easy to operate, but configuration errors occur due to human error or miscommunication

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperator configurationVSAvoidconfiguration accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs self-configuration by automatically determining the plant class present in the field and setting the plant identification model parameters without requiring operator input. The farming machine autonomously configures the model by analyzing images captured during field traversal, eliminating human error while maintaining ease of operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses feedback from the plant identification model's performance to automatically adjust and reconfigure the model. By monitoring identification accuracy and plant class determination results, the system self-corrects configuration parameters in real-time, ensuring high reliability without operator intervention.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Productivity

If the farming machine operates with an incorrectly configured model, then productivity is maintained, but harmful effects occur such as crop damage or ineffective weed control

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefarming operation efficiencyVSAvoidcrop damage and ineffective treatment
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary determination of the plant class present in the field before initiating treatment operations. By automatically identifying whether the field contains crops or weeds and configuring the model accordingly before treatment, the system prevents harmful effects while maintaining productivity throughout the operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system takes preliminary anti-action by automatically detecting potential misconfiguration risks and correcting them before harmful effects can occur. The automated plant class determination and model reconfiguration prevent crop damage and ineffective weed control by ensuring correct identification settings are in place before treatment begins.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #9Preliminary anti-action

3Measurement precision

If multiple plant identification models are applied to determine plant class, then measurement precision improves, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveplant class determination accuracyVSAvoidmulti-model system structure
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the plant identification task by applying different plant identification models for different plant classes (e.g., one model for crops, another for weeds). Each model is optimized for its specific target class, improving measurement precision while the segmentation strategy manages complexity by dividing the overall identification problem into specialized sub-tasks.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS20250212866A1Identifying incorrectly configured plant identification models in a farming machine
Publication Date: 2025.07.03 DEERE & CO
  • US20250212866A1 patent drawing
  • US20250212866A1 patent drawing
  • US20250212866A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A farming machine configured for identifying incorrectly configured plant identification models in farming machines is disclosed. The farming machine includes a control system configured to monitor the performance of a plant identification model to determine if it is appropriately configured for detecting plants in the field. To do so, the control system accesses images of plants in the field and applies a first plant identification model to the images to identify a probability plants in the images are a first class of plants. The control system applies a verification model to determine if plants in the field are the second class of plants (rather than the first) based on the determined probability. The farming machine applies a second plant identification model to the images to identify a second class of plants, and treats plants in the field identified as the second class of plant.