Industrial Plant Orchestrator Control for Adaptive Sub-System Targets

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Controlling industrial plants is a highly complicated and error-prone task, especially due to the high costs associated with faults, necessitating a higher degree of automation that considers both high-level aspects and component-level operations, which existing technologies have not effectively addressed.

Innovation Solution

A data-driven method using an orchestrator and control agent framework that integrates various control layers and agents, leveraging artificial intelligence models to derive and adjust production targets based on high-level instructions and real-time component data, enabling autonomous operation and reduced operator intervention.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a high degree of automation is implemented to reduce errors and costs, then reliability improves, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovereliabilityVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The control system is divided into multiple hierarchical layers: high-level planning layer, intermediate coordination layer (orchestrator), and low-level execution layer (control agents). Each layer handles specific tasks independently, reducing overall system complexity while maintaining high automation. The orchestrator segments coordination functions from execution functions, allowing manageable complexity at each level.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The orchestrator acts as an intermediary between high-level production targets and low-level control agents. It translates abstract production goals into specific control instructions, mediating between different control layers and reducing the complexity burden on individual components while maintaining system-wide coordination.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Adaptability or versatility

If both high-level aspects and component-level operations are considered in control, then adaptability improves, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveadaptabilityVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The control system segments adaptability requirements across different layers: the high-level layer handles strategic adaptability to production targets, while the orchestrator handles tactical adaptability to sub-system requirements, and control agents handle operational adaptability to component states. This distributed segmentation enables comprehensive adaptability without concentrating all complexity in one system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Each control layer possesses specialized local qualities tailored to its function. The orchestrator has knowledge of sub-system interdependencies and production targets, while control agents have detailed knowledge of their specific components. This local specialization enables adaptability at each level without requiring every component to handle all aspects of control complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Productivity

If continuous monitoring and updating of production processes is implemented, then productivity improves, but loss of time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveproductivityVSAvoidloss of time
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The control agents continuously monitor production processes and report status to the orchestrator without interruption. The orchestrator continuously updates production targets based on real-time feedback, ensuring continuous useful action throughout the production process. This continuity maximizes productivity while minimizing idle or non-productive time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Solution Approach 2:

A closed-loop feedback system is implemented where control agents report production status to the orchestrator, which then updates production targets and sends new instructions. This continuous feedback enables real-time productivity optimization while minimizing time loss through automated rapid response to changing conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentEP4653964A1A method for controlling a sub-system of an industrial plant
Publication Date: 2025.11.26 ABB (SCHWEIZ) AG
  • EP4653964A1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP4653964A1 patent drawingFigure 3a~3b
  • EP4653964A1 patent drawingFigure 3c~3d

AI summary

The invention relates to the field of industrial plants, particularly to a method for controlling a sub-system (200, 300, 400) of an industrial plant (100). The method comprises the steps of: retrieving, by the orchestrator (120), information about the sub-system (200, 300, 400); training the orchestrator (120), based on the retrieved information; receiving, by the orchestrator (120), a high-level production target (180) for the industrial plant (100); deriving, by the orchestrator (120), instructions regarding a production target for the sub-system (200, 300, 400); transmitting, by the orchestrator (120), the instructions to a control agent (220, 320, 420) of the sub-system (200, 300, 400); and starting, by the control agent, a production process, the production process comprising the steps of: reporting, by the control agent, a current state of the components (250, 260, 350, 360, 450, 460), an achievement degree and the alarm-logs (230, 330, 430) of the sub-system (200, 300, 400) to the orchestrator (120); and transmitting, by the orchestrator (120), updated instructions to the control agent (220, 320, 420) of the sub-system (200, 300, 400).