Process Plant Reliability Performance Index Calculation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Process plants, such as gas processing plants, face challenges in maintaining reliable operations due to unscheduled maintenance, costly accidents, and environmental concerns, with existing methods lacking comprehensive reliability performance indices to assess and improve operational readiness.

Innovation Solution

A computer-implemented method that evaluates process plant reliability by aggregating quantitative scores from multiple reliability elements, including workforce, work elements, and data assessment, using weighted scores and deductions for late or poor-quality data to provide a Plant Reliability Performance Index (PRPI) score, facilitating proactive reliability management.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If traditional reliability measurement methods are used, then simplicity is maintained, but comprehensive reliability assessment capability is insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereliability assessment capabilityVSAvoidmeasurement system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The reliability assessment system is segmented into multiple distinct reliability elements (workforce, work elements, data assessment, etc.), each measured and scored separately. This allows comprehensive coverage of all reliability aspects while maintaining manageable measurement units for each element.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The PRPI measurement system serves multiple functions simultaneously: it assesses workforce reliability, work element performance, data quality, and overall plant reliability. This multi-functional approach enables a single comprehensive measurement system to address various reliability dimensions without requiring separate specialized systems for each.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Measurement precision

If comprehensive reliability elements are measured, then reliability assessment accuracy is improved, but measurement and data collection time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereliability measurement precisionVSAvoiddata collection time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system establishes predetermined thresholds for data completeness and quality before proceeding with full PRPI calculation. This preliminary validation ensures that only sufficient and reliable data is collected, preventing unnecessary time expenditure on incomplete data gathering while maintaining measurement precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system incorporates feedback mechanisms where measurement results from individual reliability elements feed into the overall PRPI calculation. This structured feedback approach allows the system to efficiently aggregate precise measurements from multiple elements without requiring simultaneous collection of all data, thereby reducing total measurement time while maintaining precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS20240273444A1Determining reliability performance indices for process plants
Publication Date: 2024.08.15 SAUDI ARABIAN OIL CO
  • US20240273444A1 patent drawing
  • US20240273444A1 patent drawing
  • US20240273444A1 patent drawing

AI summary

To determine a reliability performance index for a process plant, from multiple sources, numerical input values representing a reliability of multiple assets operating in the process plant is received. The numerical input values are classified into multiple reliability elements. Using the numerical input values, a quantitative score is determined for each reliability element of the multiple reliability elements. Each quantitative score for each reliability value is adjusted by a weight assigned to the reliability element. The quantitative score is aggregated for each reliability element to determine an aggregate score. Demerits directed to receiving the numerical input values after a threshold duration or directed to lack of integrity of the received numerical input values are deducted, resulting in a total score measuring a reliability of the process plant. The total score is provided as an output in response to receiving the numerical input values.