Two-Stage Abnormality Detection for Noisy Plant Signals

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

In large-scale plants like nuclear and thermal power plants, detecting subtle abnormalities in process signals is challenging due to complex systems, abrupt changes, and the interference of minute electrical noise signals, which can lead to erroneous learning and incorrect abnormality detection by single machine learning models.

Innovation Solution

A two-stage machine learning model comprising a model MA and model MB is used to accurately predict plant data features, including stepwise changes and electrical noise signals, by reducing data dimensions and restoring data to its original form, enabling precise abnormality detection.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If a single machine learning model is used to detect abnormalities in plant data, then the detection process is simple, but the accuracy is reduced due to erroneous learning from complex systems, abrupt changes, and electrical noise signals

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveabnormality detection accuracyVSAvoidmodel structure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the single machine learning model into two separate models: Model MA for detecting abrupt changes and Model MB for detecting electrical noise signals. This segmentation allows each model to specialize in specific types of anomalies, improving overall detection accuracy while managing complexity through modular design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces a difference calculation unit that computes the difference between input data and output data as an intermediary step. This intermediary mechanism enables the system to separately analyze abrupt changes and electrical noise signals, resolving the contradiction by adding a processing layer that enhances accuracy without excessive complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Productivity

If data dimension reduction is applied to simplify processing, then computational efficiency improves, but information loss may occur affecting detection accuracy

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata processing efficiencyVSAvoidfeature prediction accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies dimension reduction to the difference data (after subtracting Model MA's output from input data) rather than the original input data. This preliminary action of calculating differences first preserves critical information about abrupt changes and electrical noise signals while enabling efficient processing of the reduced-dimensional data in Model MB.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS11526783B2Abnormality determination device, learning device, and abnormality determination method
Publication Date: 2022.12.13 KK TOSHIBA
  • US11526783B2 patent drawing
  • US11526783B2 patent drawing
  • US11526783B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An abnormality determination device includes one or more processors. The processors input first input data to a first model to obtain first output data. The first output data is formed by restoring data with the reduced dimension to data with the same dimension as that of the first input data. The processors input second input data, which is a difference between the first input data and the first output data, to a second model, and obtain second output data. The second output data is formed by restoring data with the reduced dimension to data with the same dimension as that of the second input data. The processors obtain restored data that is a sum of the first output data and the second output data. The processors compare the first input data with the restored data and determine an abnormality in the first input data based on the comparison result.