Plant Treatment Model Training Using Agricultural Image Interaction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current plant treatment methods are labor-intensive and costly when applied individually to plants in a field, as they often require manual application and lack customization to user preferences, leading to inefficient resource usage and weed control.

Innovation Solution

A method for selecting and training plant treatment models based on user preferences, using images of plants to generate customized treatment plans that allow farming machines to identify and treat specific plants according to user-defined actions, optimizing resource usage and weed control.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If manual treatment application is used for individual plants, then treatment precision is improved, but labor intensity and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetreatment precisionVSAvoidlabor efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces manual mechanical treatment application with an automated system that uses image processing and machine learning models to identify plants and a robotic mechanism to apply treatment. The system captures images of plants, processes them through trained models to identify target plants, and automatically applies treatment without manual intervention, thus maintaining precision while dramatically improving productivity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system enables the farming machine to autonomously perform treatment operations by integrating image capture, plant identification through machine learning models, and automated treatment application. The machine serves itself by making independent decisions about which plants to treat based on real-time image analysis, eliminating the need for human operators to manually identify and treat each plant

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Ease of operation

If uniform treatment is applied to all plants, then operation simplicity is improved, but adaptability to user preferences deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperation simplicityVSAvoidtreatment customization
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adapts treatment operations to user preferences by allowing configuration of multiple plant treatment models with different parameters. Users can adjust model parameters such as plant size thresholds, treatment thresholds, and resource allocation settings. The system flexibly switches between different models and adjusts their parameters in real-time based on field conditions and user preferences, making the operation adaptable without sacrificing simplicity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements adaptability through parameter configuration of plant treatment models. Users can modify parameters such as minimum plant size for treatment, treatment intensity, and resource allocation ratios. The system processes these parameter changes and adjusts its treatment decisions accordingly, enabling customized treatment strategies for different scenarios while maintaining ease of operation through a unified interface

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Adaptability or versatility

If multiple plant treatment models are trained with different parameters, then adaptability is improved, but model selection complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemodel varietyVSAvoidmodel selection complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system incorporates feedback mechanisms that automatically evaluate the performance of different plant treatment models based on field conditions and treatment outcomes. The feedback loop monitors treatment effectiveness, resource consumption, and model accuracy, then uses this information to automatically select or adjust the appropriate model. This feedback-driven approach eliminates the need for manual model selection, reducing complexity while preserving the benefits of multiple specialized models

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

4Reliability

If treatment resources are allocated to all identified plants, then weed control effectiveness is improved, but resource consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveweed control effectivenessVSAvoidtreatment resource consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies local quality by differentiating treatment allocation based on local field conditions and plant characteristics. Instead of uniform treatment allocation, the system analyzes each plant's identity, size, location, and threat level to determine appropriate treatment. High-priority plants receive treatment resources while low-priority plants may be monitored or treated with reduced resources, achieving effective weed control with optimized resource consumption

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS20250005738A1Plant treatment model training based on agricultural image interaction
Publication Date: 2025.01.02 DEERE & CO
  • US20250005738A1 patent drawing
  • US20250005738A1 patent drawing
  • US20250005738A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Embodiments relate to training a plant treatment model. A control system may provide images of plants for display to a user. The control system may receive one or more plant treatment action preferences of the user. The one or more plant treatment action preferences include labels for the images that identify plants in the images and treatment actions to be applied to the identified plants. The control system may train the plant treatment model based on the one or more plant treatment action preferences. The trained plant treatment model is configured to, when applied to an image of plants in a field, determine treatment actions to be applied to the plants in accordance with the one or more plant treatment action preferences of the user. The control system may configure a farming machine to operate based on the trained plant treatment model.