Planter Depth Control via Down Force Segmentation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current planter technology requires operators to frequently leave the cab to adjust row unit depth, especially on larger planters, which is time-consuming and inefficient, and existing electric actuators for depth control are too large and draw high amperage, making them impractical for use in existing row units.

Innovation Solution

A planter depth control system that uses an electric actuator with a gauge wheel depth control linkage, where the down force is adjusted by an actuable device such as an air bag, allowing for reduced amperage draw and smaller actuator size, enabling depth adjustments within existing space constraints without the need for additional power provisioning.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If existing electric actuators are used for depth control, then depth adjustment capability is achieved, but the actuator size becomes too large and amperage draw becomes too high for existing row units

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedepth adjustment capabilityVSAvoidactuator size
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSVolume of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system divides the depth control function into two separate components: a down force control device (air bag or hydraulic actuator) that applies vertical force to the row unit, and a smaller electric actuator that only needs to move the gauge wheel linkage. This segmentation allows the electric actuator to be much smaller since it doesn't need to overcome the full down force, only move the linkage against reduced resistance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The down force control device is activated first to reduce or eliminate the down force on the row unit before the electric actuator moves the gauge wheel linkage. This preliminary action creates favorable conditions for the electric actuator to operate with reduced amperage draw and smaller size, as it only needs to move the lightweight linkage without fighting against soil resistance and row unit weight.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Productivity

If larger planters with more row units are used to cover more acreage, then productivity increases, but the time required for depth adjustments increases significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveacreage coverageVSAvoiddepth adjustment time
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system enables self-service depth adjustment by allowing the operator to control row unit depth from the cab using electronic controls, eliminating the need to manually leave the cab and physically adjust each row unit. The electric actuators automatically position the gauge wheels based on operator input or automated control signals.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The manual mechanical adjustment system is replaced with an automated electro-mechanical system. Electric actuators replace manual hand wheels and linkages, enabling depth adjustment to be controlled electronically from the cab rather than requiring physical manual operation at each row unit location.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Device complexity

If manual depth adjustment is used, then device complexity is low, but operational efficiency decreases due to frequent cab exits

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol system simplicityVSAvoidoperational efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The down force control device serves multiple functions: it controls the vertical position of the row unit, enables automated depth adjustment, and works in conjunction with the electric actuator to provide precise gauge wheel positioning. This multi-functionality allows a single device to handle both force control and positioning tasks.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The down force control device acts as an intermediary between the row unit weight and the electric actuator. By controlling the down force applied to the row unit, it creates optimal conditions for the electric actuator to move the gauge wheel linkage, mediating between the heavy row unit and the small actuator to enable efficient depth adjustment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enables efficient depth adjustments with a maximum current draw of less than eight amps, allowing smaller electric actuators to fit within existing row units, reducing the need for additional power equipment and improving operational efficiency by allowing depth adjustments from the cab.

Implementation Method 1

a first device coupled to the upper portion and configured to provide an adjustable down force

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPneumatic pressure: Pressure Increase

Data Source

PatentUS10462956B2Down force control to allow for easier depth adjustment
Publication Date: 2019.11.05 AGCO CORP
  • US10462956B2 patent drawing
  • US10462956B2 patent drawing
  • US10462956B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A row unit, including a frame with an upper portion and a lower portion, the upper portion having a parallel linkage, the lower portion having a gauge wheel depth control linkage, the gauge wheel depth control linkage coupled to plural gauge wheels; a first device coupled to the upper portion and configured to provide an adjustable down force; and an electric actuator coupled to the gauge wheel depth control linkage, the electric actuator configured to provide adjustable positioning of the gauge wheels.