Planter Toolbar Flexion Detection for Row Unit Alignment

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Agricultural implements experience undesirable flexing of bars due to drag forces, leading to misalignment of row units and improper placement of seeds or fertilizer, which can result in mechanical wear and require frequent repairs.

Innovation Solution

Implementing sensors, such as IMU, strain gauges, and GNSS, to monitor deflections of toolbar ends and joints, with a controller comparing these signals to identify and alert operators of excessive flexion, allowing for adjustments to maintain alignment and reduce wear.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If the toolbar is made longer to accommodate more row units, then the productivity is improved, but the drag force increases causing greater flexion and misalignment

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenumber of row unitsVSAvoidtoolbar alignment
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements sensors at multiple locations along the toolbar to continuously monitor deflection and provide feedback to a control system. This feedback enables real-time detection of flexion caused by drag forces, allowing the system to compensate for alignment changes while maintaining high productivity with longer toolbars.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces adjustable components that allow the toolbar to dynamically adapt to varying drag forces and soil conditions. The system can adjust the tension and alignment of row units in response to real-time measurements, maintaining stability despite the increased length and associated flexion.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Productivity

If the row units are spaced closer together to increase planting density, then the productivity is improved, but the drag force on each row unit increases causing greater toolbar flexion

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveplanting densityVSAvoidrow unit alignment
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

Sensors are positioned to monitor the deflection of individual row units and the toolbar as a whole. This feedback system detects alignment changes caused by increased drag forces from closer spacing, enabling real-time compensation to maintain precise planting density while preventing misalignment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent divides the toolbar into segments with individual sensors monitoring each section. This segmentation allows the system to identify and compensate for localized flexion caused by varying drag forces from densely spaced row units, maintaining overall alignment despite high planting density.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Manufacturing precision

If the toolbar is made more rigid to reduce flexion, then the manufacturing precision is improved, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetoolbar alignmentVSAvoidstructure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of relying solely on increased mechanical rigidity to prevent flexion, the patent replaces pure mechanical solutions with a sensor-based detection and control system. This substitution allows the toolbar to maintain precision through intelligent control rather than excessive structural complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the operational parameters of the toolbar system by introducing adjustable tension, alignment mechanisms, and real-time control based on sensor feedback. This allows the system to maintain manufacturing precision through parameter adjustment rather than increasing structural rigidity, thereby avoiding excessive device complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enhances the accuracy of seed and fertilizer placement by correcting misalignments and reduces mechanical wear through timely maintenance alerts, thereby extending the implement's lifespan and operational efficiency.

Implementation Method 1

The first sensor or the second sensor includes an inertial measurement unit (IMU) sensor

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectInertial measurement: Accelerometer

Implementation Method 2

The first sensor or the second sensor includes a strain gauge

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectStrain measurement: Piezoresistive Effect

Implementation Method 3

at least one of the first sensor, the second sensor, or the third sensor include a GNSS sensor

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectGlobal navigation satellite system:

Data Source

PatentEP4599657A1Planter flexion identification
Publication Date: 2025.08.13 DEERE & CO
  • EP4599657A1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP4599657A1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP4599657A1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

An agricultural system including a work implement (12) for fertilizing or planting seed in a field. The work implement (12) includes a toolbar (14) having a first terminating end (72) and a second terminating end (74), wherein the toolbar (14) includes a plurality of row units (28). A first sensor (70A) is operatively connected to the first end (72) and a second sensor (70B) is operatively connected to the second end (74). The toolbar (14) defines a longitudinal axis (58), wherein the first sensor (70A) identifies a first deflection of the first end (70A) with respect to the longitudinal axis (58) and the second sensor (70B) identifies a second deflection of the second end (74) with respect to the longitudinal axis (58). A user interface (80) is operatively connected to the first sensor (70A) and to the second sensor (70B), wherein the user interface (80) identifies one or both of the first deflection and the second deflection.