Row Planting Unit Triangular Head Frame Cable Routing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Row unit planters in farming operations face challenges due to wear and damage from continuous movement and exposure to debris and chemicals, leading to difficulties in replacing worn parts, especially when newer components are not readily available or compatible with existing systems, resulting in increased costs and labor.

Innovation Solution

A row planting unit design featuring a lower shank and head frame made from a single metal material with a triangular cross-section, incorporating cable supports and pivotable arms, which allows for secure cable routing and attachment, reducing interference with the planting mechanism and facilitating easier maintenance.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If traditional row unit components are used continuously, then productivity is maintained, but wear and damage occur leading to increased repair difficulty and cost

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveplanting operation continuityVSAvoidpart replacement difficulty
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSEase of repair

Solution Approach 1:

The row unit is divided into modular components (hopper, metering unit, seed tube, furrow opener, closing wheels) that can be independently replaced. The mounting structure with standardized interfaces enables individual component segmentation, allowing farmers to replace only worn parts rather than entire assemblies, thus maintaining productivity while easing repair operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The head frame and mounting structure are designed with universal interfaces that can accommodate multiple component types and configurations. The standardized mounting points and attachment mechanisms allow different furrow openers, seed tubes, and closing wheels to be interchangeably mounted on the same row unit, providing versatility and simplifying part replacement across different operating conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Adaptability or versatility

If newer components with retrofitted features are installed, then functionality is improved, but compatibility with existing parts becomes problematic

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomponent functionalityVSAvoidparts compatibility
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSEase of repair

Solution Approach 1:

The head frame incorporates universal mounting interfaces and standardized attachment points that work with both traditional and modernized components. The design includes multiple mounting locations and adjustable features that allow retrofitted components to be integrated with existing row unit structures, ensuring compatibility while enabling functional upgrades.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The row unit employs adjustable and reconfigurable mounting mechanisms that can adapt to different component configurations. The dynamic adjustment capabilities allow the same mounting structure to accommodate various component sizes, shapes, and types, ensuring compatibility between newer retrofitted parts and existing system architecture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Reliability

If multiple components are replaced during maintenance, then reliability is improved, but labor and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverow unit performanceVSAvoidmaintenance labor time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The row unit components are segmented into independently replaceable modules with standardized mounting interfaces. This segmentation allows maintenance personnel to quickly identify and replace only the specific worn components rather than disassembling and replacing entire assemblies, significantly reducing maintenance labor time while maintaining reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The design includes pre-configured mounting hardware, standardized interfaces, and easily accessible component locations that are prepared in advance for quick replacement. The mounting structure includes pre-installed attachment points and alignment features that eliminate the need for complex assembly procedures during maintenance, reducing time loss while improving reliability through consistent reinstallation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS20240423115A1Row planting unit and method of use
Publication Date: 2024.12.26 G B G I INC
  • US20240423115A1 patent drawing
  • US20240423115A1 patent drawing
  • US20240423115A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A row planting unit that includes a lower shank, a head frame that operably engages with the lower shank, a pair of upper planting arms that pivotably engages with the head frame, and a lower planting arm that pivotably engages with the head frame and is adapted to operably engaged with an actuating device. Each of the lower shank, the head frame, the pair of upper planting arms, and the lower planting arm is casted from a single metal material.