Plasma Abatement Device Multi-Inlet Redundancy

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing plasma abatement systems for treating gas streams in semiconductor and similar industries require continuous operation of a primary plasma burner, leading to high costs due to the need for a backup device, as they cannot function without a functioning plasma burner, which is often idle and expensive.

Innovation Solution

A system with a DC plasma torch and multiple inlets allows for reagent gas to be used efficiently in normal conditions and switches to using process gas through a secondary inlet in backup conditions, ensuring uninterrupted treatment by diverting gas streams through existing plasma abatement devices, even if primary ducts or burners fail.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a backup plasma burner device is provided to ensure continuous operation, then system reliability is improved, but device complexity and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontinuous operation capabilityVSAvoidsystem redundancy
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The second inlet, originally designed solely for reagent gas supply, is made multi-functional to also accept process gas streams when the primary plasma burner fails. This allows the same physical infrastructure to serve dual purposes: normal reagent injection and backup process gas treatment, eliminating the need for separate backup ducting and reducing system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system incorporates dynamic switching capability through a control unit that can redirect process gas streams from the primary plasma burner to the second inlet of an alternative plasma burner. This dynamic reconfiguration allows the system to adapt to failure conditions without requiring permanent duplicate infrastructure, maintaining reliability while reducing static complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Reliability

If a backup plasma burner device is provided to ensure continuous operation, then system reliability is improved, but operational cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontinuous operation capabilityVSAvoidoperational cost
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The existing plasma abatement device with its second inlet is made to serve itself as a backup unit. Instead of requiring an entirely separate backup system, the device can redirect its own or alternative process gas streams through the second inlet to continue treatment functions, reducing the need for redundant expensive equipment and lowering operational costs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system recovers the functionality of the second inlet, which would otherwise be underutilized or idle during normal operation, and repurposes it for backup process gas treatment. This recovery of latent capability eliminates the need to maintain expensive idle backup plasma burners, reducing operational costs while ensuring continuous treatment capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #34Discarding and recovering

3Productivity

If reagent gas is supplied to improve treatment efficiency, then treatment efficiency is improved, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetreatment efficiencyVSAvoidgas duct configuration
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The second inlet is designed with multi-functionality, serving both as a reagent gas supply port during normal operation and as an alternative process gas inlet during backup conditions. This eliminates the need for completely separate ducting systems for different gas streams, reducing overall system complexity while maintaining treatment efficiency through reagent injection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This configuration maintains continuous operation of semiconductor processing by allowing process gases to be treated without reagents, reducing system redundancy and operational costs by utilizing existing plasma abatement devices for backup, ensuring uninterrupted gas treatment with a modest reduction in efficiency.

Implementation Method 1

a DC plasma torch for generating a plasma stream, from an inert gas, for injection into the chamber for treating said process gas stream

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPlasma discharge: Plasma

Implementation Method 2

The plasma causes dissociation of the gas stream into reactive species, such as radicals

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectThermal dissociation: Thermal Energy Storage

Data Source

PatentEP2780101B1Apparatus for treating a gas stream
Publication Date: 2021.02.17 EDWARDS LTD
  • EP2780101B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP2780101B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP2780101B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

The present invention provides apparatus for treating a gas stream (22). A plasma abatement device (10) has a reaction chamber (14) and a plasma torch (12) for generating a plasma stream for injection into the chamber for treating the gas stream. A first inlet (18) conveys a gas stream into the plasma abatement device for treatment, and a second inlet (20), in a normal condition of the apparatus, is in flow communication with a source of reagent for conveying reagent (24) into the plasma device for improving the efficiency of the treatment. In a back-up condition of the apparatus, the second inlet is in flow communication with a gas stream source for conveying a gas stream into the device for treatment.