Plasma Tool Component Tracking via RFID

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Manual tracking of components in plasma processing systems is inefficient and prone to human error, leading to potential damage and increased costs due to the lack of timely and accurate data sharing between tools and centralized databases.

Innovation Solution

A dynamic component-tracking system that enables bi-directional communication between tools and a centralized database, allowing for automatic data transfer and retrieval, and incorporating rule-based events to ensure informed decision-making and efficient resource management.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If manual tracking methods are used to maintain plasma processing system components, then device complexity is reduced, but productivity decreases and human error increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomponent tracking efficiencyVSAvoidtracking system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system enables automatic self-tracking of components through machine-readable identifiers (barcodes, RFID tags) that components carry. When components are moved or installed, the system automatically detects and records their location, status, and history without requiring manual data entry, thus improving productivity while keeping the system relatively simple

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces manual mechanical tracking methods with automated electronic identification and data capture systems. Barcodes, RFID tags, and optical scanners substitute for manual record-keeping, eliminating human error and significantly improving tracking efficiency without adding substantial complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Loss of information

If centralized databases are used to store component data, then information availability improves, but data transfer time and potential for errors increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomponent history availabilityVSAvoiddata transfer time
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system pre-records component information (manufacturing data, maintenance history, calibration records) in the centralized database before components are installed or moved. This preliminary data capture ensures that complete component history is immediately available when needed, eliminating delays in data retrieval and preventing information loss

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements automatic feedback loops where component status changes (installation, removal, maintenance events) are immediately detected via machine-readable identifiers and automatically updated in the centralized database. This real-time feedback mechanism ensures information accuracy and immediate availability without manual intervention delays

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Reliability

If components are tracked manually across multiple tools, then system simplicity is maintained, but reliability of component management decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomponent management accuracyVSAvoidtracking system structure
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces machine-readable identifiers (barcodes, RFID tags) as intermediaries between physical components and the digital tracking system. These identifiers serve as reliable mediators that automatically link components to their digital records, ensuring accurate tracking across multiple tools without requiring complex manual procedures or increasing system complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses universal machine-readable identifier standards (barcodes, RFID) that can be applied to all component types across all tools. This universal approach ensures consistent and reliable tracking throughout the entire plasma processing system without requiring tool-specific or component-specific tracking mechanisms, maintaining simplicity while improving reliability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

4Ease of operation

If real-time component data sharing is implemented between tools and databases, then decision-making quality improves, but system complexity and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinformed decision-makingVSAvoiddata communication infrastructure
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system enables tools and components to automatically self-report status information, location, and history through machine-readable identifiers. This self-service data sharing provides real-time information for informed decision-making without requiring complex centralized control or manual data collection, thus improving ease of operation without proportionally increasing system complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS8010483B2Component-tracking system and methods therefor
Publication Date: 2011.08.30 LAM RES CORP
  • US8010483B2 patent drawing
  • US8010483B2 patent drawing
  • US8010483B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A system for facilitating plasma processing tool component management across plurality of tools is provided. The system includes means for receiving first component data for first plurality of components, including identification and usage history for a first plurality of components, at first database associated with first tool. The system also includes means for receiving second component data for second plurality of components at second database associated with second tool, which is different from first tool. The system further includes means for synchronizing first and second component data with third database. The synchronizing includes synchronizing between third database and at least one of first and second database rules that govern usage of at least one component of first and second plurality of components. The third database is coupled to exchange data with plurality of tools. The system yet also includes means for obtaining information, using rules and usage history data about given component prior to performing one of replacement, analysis, and maintenance.