Plasma Dicing of Semiconductor Substrates to Minimize Side Wall Cracks

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional semiconductor chip separation methods, such as mechanical sawing and plasma dicing, often result in fine cracks in chip side walls and require broad kerfs, leading to reliability issues and difficulties with metallization processing.

Innovation Solution

A partial dicing method involving the formation of grooves or trenches between chips, followed by complete separation using mechanical or particle beam techniques, which reduces stress and allows for precise control over metallization removal to enhance separation quality.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If mechanical sawing techniques are used for separation, then chip separation can be achieved, but broad kerfs and crack formation occur

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveseparation qualityVSAvoidcrack formation and broad kerfs
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces mechanical sawing with plasma dicing technology. The plasma beam (electromagnetic field-based) eliminates the need for physical contact between the cutting tool and the substrate, thereby avoiding mechanical stress that causes cracks and broad kerfs. The plasma process achieves precise separation with minimal damage to the chip structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the physical state and parameters of the cutting process from mechanical to plasma-based. By controlling plasma parameters such as power, gas flow, and beam focus, the process achieves precise kerf width control and eliminates crack formation associated with mechanical sawing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Manufacturing precision

If plasma dicing is used for separation, then narrow kerfs can be achieved, but metallization causes processing difficulties

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvekerf width precisionVSAvoidprocess complexity due to metallization
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the plasma dicing process into distinct stages: first dicing through the semiconductor substrate, then separate etching of the metallization layers. This segmentation allows optimization of each stage independently, using appropriate plasma parameters for substrate cutting and different parameters for metal layer removal.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces photoresist or other masking materials as intermediaries to protect specific areas during plasma dicing. These intermediaries enable selective removal of metallization layers while preserving the substrate structure, simplifying the overall process by providing clear process control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Productivity

If conventional separation processes are used, then chip separation can be achieved, but fine cracks occur in side walls of chip dies

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveseparation efficiencyVSAvoidchip die reliability due to side wall cracks
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces mechanical separation processes with plasma-based dicing. The plasma beam removes material through vaporization and chemical reactions rather than mechanical force, eliminating the lateral stress that causes cracks in chip side walls while maintaining high separation efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses plasma (ionized gas) as the cutting medium, which flows and interacts with the substrate in a controlled manner. The plasma jet delivers energy concentrated at the kerf zone, achieving clean separation without the mechanical contact that causes side wall cracking.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #29Pneumatics and hydraulics

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach minimizes crack formation and improves the quality of chip separation, reducing the risk of reliability issues and enabling more precise control over metallization, resulting in higher-quality chip dies.

Implementation Method 1

when chip separation is performed using so-called plasma dicing

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPlasma dicing: Plasma

Implementation Method 2

partial dicing of a substrate is performed, that is, material between chips or other substrate parts to be separated is partially removed

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMaterial removal by plasma: Ablation

Implementation Method 3

The substrate is then treated with a particle beam, for example, a water beam or ion beam

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectParticle beam treatment: Ion Beam

Implementation Method 4

or with a laser beam

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectLaser heating: Laser

Implementation Method 5

or in which an expansion of an expansion tape is used to separate the chip dies from each other

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMechanical expansion:

Data Source

PatentUS9219011B2Separation of chips on a substrate
Publication Date: 2015.12.22 INFINEON TECHNOLOGIES AG
  • US9219011B2 patent drawing
  • US9219011B2 patent drawing
  • US9219011B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Various methods and apparatuses are provided relating to separation of a substrate into a plurality of parts. For example, first a partial separation is performed and then the partially separated substrate is completely separated into a plurality of parts.