Plasma Etching Control Without Gas Switching for Silicon Oxide

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The existing dry etching methods, such as ALE, face challenges in achieving high speed and selection ratio due to the time-consuming process of gas switching between deposition and etching steps, which decreases throughput and compromises etching quality.

Innovation Solution

A substrate processing method involving a plasma processing system that uses a combination of fluorocarbon and rare gases, where the etching process is enhanced by alternating between two distinct plasma generations conditions using RF signals, allowing for faster and more precise etching without gas switching.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If gas switching method is used to separate deposition and etching steps, then etching selection ratio is improved, but processing speed decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveetching selection ratioVSAvoidprocessing speed
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the control parameter from gas composition switching to RF power parameter switching. By adjusting RF power between high and low states, the system achieves deposition and etching functions without changing the gas composition, thereby eliminating gas switching delays while maintaining etching selection ratio.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements periodic switching of RF power to alternately perform deposition and etching steps. The RF power is periodically modulated between high and low states, creating a cyclic process that achieves both deposition and etching functions in sequence without requiring gas composition changes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

2Reliability

If gas switching is performed between deposition and etching steps, then process control is improved, but throughput decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocess controlVSAvoidthroughput
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces gas composition control with RF power parameter control. By modulating RF power levels, the system maintains precise process control for both deposition and etching steps without the throughput penalty associated with gas switching operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent eliminates the interruption caused by gas switching by maintaining continuous gas flow while switching only the RF power parameter. This continuous action approach removes the downtime associated with gas composition changes, thereby improving throughput while maintaining process control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

3Manufacturing precision

If ALE method with separated steps is used, then etching quality is improved, but processing time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveetching qualityVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent maintains the quality benefits of separated deposition and etching steps by using RF power parameter changes, but reduces processing time by eliminating the gas switching operations that normally separate these steps. The RF power switching is much faster than gas composition changes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent prepares the gas composition in advance to support both deposition and etching functions, eliminating the need for intermediate gas switching. By pre-configuring the gas mixture, the system can quickly switch between deposition and etching modes using only RF power changes, reducing overall processing time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach enables etching at a higher speed and with a higher selection ratio compared to traditional gas switching methods, improving throughput and etching quality by independently controlling deposition and etching steps through RF signal modulation.

Implementation Method 1

plasma-processing the processing target object by a first plasma of the process gas generated under a first plasma generation condition

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPlasma generation: Plasma

Implementation Method 2

alternating between two distinct plasma generations conditions using RF signals

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectRF signal modulation: Electromagnetic Induction

Implementation Method 3

supplying a process gas containing fluorocarbon and a rare gas to a processing container

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectChemical reactions in plasma: Chemical Bonding

Implementation Method 4

plasma-processing the processing target object in which a bias potential is generated on the processing target object by a second plasma

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectIon irradiation: Ion Beam

Data Source

PatentUS20230386794A1Substrate processing method and substrate processing apparatus
Publication Date: 2023.11.30 TOKYO ELECTRON LTD
  • US20230386794A1 patent drawing
  • US20230386794A1 patent drawing
  • US20230386794A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A substrate processing method is a substrate processing method for a substrate processing apparatus. The method includes: a) supplying a process gas containing fluorocarbon and a rare gas to a processing container in which a placing pedestal for placing a processing target object including a first region made of silicon oxide is arranged; b) plasma-processing the processing target object by a first plasma of the process gas generated under a first plasma generation condition; c) plasma-processing the processing target object in which a bias potential is generated on the processing target object by a second plasma of the process gas generated under a second plasma generation condition different from the first plasma generation condition; and d) repeating the b) and the c).