Plasma Gas Oxide Removal in Thermocompression Bonding

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Thermocompression bonding processes require the removal of oxide layers, which is typically achieved using fluxes, leading to increased costs, environmental impact, and inefficiencies due to the need for flux application and deflux processes.

Innovation Solution

The use of a localized reducing plasma gas to remove metal oxides prior to bonding, eliminating the need for fluxes and reducing the number of processing steps, thereby minimizing re-oxidation risks and equipment requirements.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If fluxes are used to remove oxide layers during thermocompression bonding, then oxide removal is achieved, but manufacturing costs increase and environmental impact worsens

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoxide layer removal qualityVSAvoidmanufacturing cost
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts and eliminates the flux application step from the thermocompression bonding process by using plasma gas to directly remove oxide layers. This removes the harmful substance (flux) and its associated costs while maintaining oxide removal effectiveness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the chemical environment from using liquid flux to using plasma gas (such as hydrogen plasma). This parameter change in the reactive species used for oxide removal eliminates the need for flux application and deflux processes, reducing manufacturing costs and environmental impact.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Manufacturing precision

If fluxes are used to remove oxide layers, then oxide removal is achieved, but the number of processing steps increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoxide layer removal qualityVSAvoidprocessing efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent removes the deflux processing step from the workflow by using plasma gas instead of liquid flux. Since plasma gas does not leave residues like liquid flux does, the separate deflux process becomes unnecessary, streamlining the overall process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent combines the oxide removal function into the plasma treatment step itself, which is already part of the bonding process preparation. This merges what would otherwise be separate steps (flux application, oxide removal, deflux) into a more integrated process flow.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

3Manufacturing precision

If fluxes are used for oxide removal, then oxide layers are removed, but re-oxidation risk increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoxide layer removal qualityVSAvoidre-oxidation resistance
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses plasma gas (such as hydrogen or inert gas plasma) to create a controlled atmospheric environment during oxide removal. This plasma environment prevents re-oxidation by maintaining reducing or inert conditions throughout the process, unlike liquid flux which requires subsequent protective handling.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #39Inert atmosphere (Inert environment)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the liquid flux chemical system with a plasma gas system. This substitution eliminates the need for liquid handling and associated contamination risks, while the plasma environment inherently protects against re-oxidation through its reactive species and atmospheric control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

4Manufacturing precision

If fluxes are used to remove oxide layers, then oxide removal is achieved, but equipment requirements and complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoxide layer removal qualityVSAvoidequipment requirements
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent eliminates the need for flux dispensing equipment and deflux processing equipment by using plasma gas. This extraction of the liquid flux system removes associated equipment complexity while maintaining oxide removal capability through plasma treatment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach significantly reduces manufacturing costs, conserves resources, and enhances throughput by directly removing oxide layers with high reactivity, resulting in a more efficient and cost-effective bonding process.

Implementation Method 1

The plasma gas can remove metal oxides from components prior to bonding

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPlasma: Plasma

Implementation Method 2

a localized reducing plasma gas to remove metal oxides prior to bonding

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectChemical reduction: Reduction

Implementation Method 3

Two metals, e.g. gold (Au)-gold (Au), are brought into atomic contact applying force and heat simultaneously. The diffusion requires atomic contact between the surfaces due to the atomic motion.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectDiffusion bonding: Diffusion Welding

Implementation Method 4

applying force and heat simultaneously

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectThermal energy: Heating

Implementation Method 5

applying force and heat simultaneously

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPressure: Pressure Increase

Data Source

PatentUS10297567B2Thermocompression bonding using plasma gas
Publication Date: 2019.05.21 INTEL CORP
  • US10297567B2 patent drawing
  • US10297567B2 patent drawing
  • US10297567B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Described herein are devices and techniques for thermocompression bonding. A device can include a housing, a platform, and a plasma jet. The housing can define a chamber. The platform can be located within the chamber and can be proximate a thermocompression chip bonder. The plasma jet can be located proximate the platform. The plasma jet can be movable about the platform. The plasma jet can include a nozzle arranged to direct a plasma gas onto the platform. Also described are other embodiments for thermocompression bonding.