Plasma Arc Melting with Series Induction Stirring

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for melting reactive metals like titanium, zirconium, and their alloys face challenges such as high yield loss during forging, grain size issues due to inefficient heating, and contamination from oxide refractories, making it difficult to achieve homogeneous ingots, especially for small cross-sectional sizes.

Innovation Solution

A system that uses a plasma arc torch in conjunction with an induction coil, where the coil is in series with the plasma arc, providing electromagnetic stirring without a separate power source, to melt and homogenize the metals within a water-cooled copper vessel, allowing for efficient melting and pouring into molds to form ingots with desired properties.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of energy

If traditional induction furnaces with oxide refractories are used, then melting can be achieved, but contamination occurs and thermal efficiency is low (25%)

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvethermal efficiencyVSAvoidcontamination from oxide refractories
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces oxide refractories with an inert gas atmosphere (argon or nitrogen) in the furnace chamber. This inert environment prevents contamination of reactive metals while allowing the use of a graphite crucible, which has high thermal efficiency and does not react with the molten metal. The inert atmosphere resolves the contradiction by eliminating harmful chemical reactions while maintaining energy efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #39Inert atmosphere (Inert environment)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses a composite system combining a graphite crucible with an inert gas atmosphere. The graphite crucible provides efficient heat conduction and structural integrity, while the inert gas provides chemical protection. This composite approach achieves both high thermal efficiency and contamination-free melting.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

2Manufacturing precision

If large ingots are forged down to small cross-sectional size, then small ingots can be produced, but yield loss is high (60-70%) and grain size is too large

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegrain size controlVSAvoidyield loss during forging
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the mechanical forging process with a direct casting process. Instead of melting large ingots and mechanically forging them down (which causes yield loss and grain growth), the invention melts raw materials directly and casts them into the desired small cross-sectional shape. This substitution of mechanical processing with a thermal-casting process eliminates yield loss and produces fine grain structures appropriate for the final size.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Stability of the object's composition

If induction coil with separate power source is used, then electromagnetic stirring can be achieved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehomogeneity of molten metalVSAvoidseparate power source for induction coil
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines the heating and stirring functions into a single induction coil system. The same induction coil that heats the raw materials also provides electromagnetic stirring of the molten metal. This merging of functions eliminates the need for a separate power source and complex additional equipment, while still achieving homogeneous composition through electromagnetic stirring during the melting process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This method achieves superior homogeneity and efficiency in melting, reducing yield loss and grain size issues, while avoiding contamination, enabling the production of small cross-sectional ingots with improved chemical and structural properties.

Implementation Method 1

A plasma arc torch melts at least some of the raw material within the vessel to thereby create a molten material

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPlasma arc: Electric Arc

Implementation Method 2

An inductor, physically disposed adjacent the vessel, and electrically disposed in series with the vessel in operation, effects electromagnetic stirring of the molten material by interacting with the current of the plasma arc torch

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectromagnetic stirring: Electromagnetic Stirring

Implementation Method 3

water-cooled copper vessel

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectThermal conduction: Conduction (thermal)

Implementation Method 4

water-cooled copper vessel

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectConvection: Convection

Data Source

PatentEP2895812B1System and method of melting raw materials
Publication Date: 2018.11.21 RETECH SYSTEMS LLC
  • EP2895812B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP2895812B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP2895812B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

A system and method for melting a raw material. The raw material is fed into an electrically conductive vessel. A plasma arc torch melts at least some of the raw material within the vessel to thereby create a molten material. An inductor, physically disposed adjacent the vessel, and electrically disposed in series with the vessel in operation, effects electromagnetic stirring of the molten material by interacting with the current of the plasma arc torch.