Plasma Torch Nozzle Geometry for Lower Cutting Noise

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Plasma cutting technologies generate high levels of noise pollution due to the high energy density and flow speed of the plasma gas, leading to unpleasant and potentially harmful sound levels, which affect both cut quality and operator health.

Innovation Solution

A nozzle design for plasma torches, laser cutting heads, or plasma laser cutting heads with a specific geometry that includes a first portion narrowing conically and a second portion widening conically, with carefully defined angles and dimensions, which redirects the noise-generating geometry of the nozzle to break up and dampen sound waves within the nozzle, reducing noise levels without compromising cut quality.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Power

If conventional nozzle geometry is used, then high current density and energy density are achieved, but high noise levels (105-110 dB(A)) are generated

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenergy densityVSAvoidnoise level
Core Design Contradiction:
PowerVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies parameter changes by modifying the geometric parameters of the nozzle, specifically the narrowing angle (15°-40°) and widening angle (5°-15°) of the conical portions. These parameter changes alter the plasma flow characteristics and noise generation mechanism while maintaining the required energy density for effective cutting.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies local quality by creating different geometric zones within the nozzle: a first conical portion for narrowing with specific angles, a second conical portion for widening with different angles, and a cylindrical portion. Each zone has optimized local geometry to control plasma flow and reduce noise at specific locations without compromising overall energy density.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Productivity

If high current density (50-150 A/mm2) is used in the nozzle bore, then effective plasma cutting is achieved, but noise pollution increases to over 100 dB(A)

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecutting efficiencyVSAvoidnoise pollution
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the geometric parameters of the nozzle bore, specifically implementing a two-stage conical geometry with narrowing angle of 15°-40° and widening angle of 5°-15°. This parameter modification allows maintaining high current density for effective cutting while reducing noise pollution through optimized plasma flow control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Power

If small nozzle bore is used to achieve high current density, then high energy density is generated, but noise levels increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenergy densityVSAvoidnoise level
Core Design Contradiction:
PowerVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by dividing the nozzle bore into distinct zones with different geometric characteristics: a first conical portion for compression, a second conical portion for expansion, and a cylindrical portion. Each zone has optimized local geometry to control plasma flow and reduce noise while maintaining the small bore size necessary for high energy density.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The new nozzle geometry significantly reduces sound pressure levels by up to 15 dB(A), from 105-110 dB(A) to 90-95 dB(A), effectively mitigating noise pollution while maintaining cut quality and potentially extending the service life of the nozzle components.

Implementation Method 1

redirects the noise-generating geometry of the nozzle to break up and dampen sound waves within the nozzle, reducing noise levels

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSound wave dampening: Acoustic Absorption

Implementation Method 2

the combination of high temperature and high kinetic energy of the plasma gas flowing through the nozzle bore lead to the melting of the workpiece and to the expulsion of the melt

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPlasma jet flow: Jet

Data Source

PatentUS11856684B2Nozzle for a plasma arc torch head, laser cutting head and plasma laser cutting head, assemblies, plasma arc torch head and plasma arc torch comprising same, laser cutting head comprising same, and plasma laser cutting head comprising same
Publication Date: 2023.12.26 KJELLBERG STIFTUNG
  • US11856684B2 patent drawing
  • US11856684B2 patent drawing
  • US11856684B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Nozzle for a plasma torch head, laser cutting head or plasma laser cutting head, arrangement composed of such a nozzle and of a nozzle protection cap, arrangement composed of such a nozzle and of an electrode, plasma torch head, laser cutting head or plasma laser cutting head having such a nozzle and/or having such an arrangement, plasma torch comprising such a plasma torch head, laser cutting head comprising such a nozzle and/or such an arrangement, plasma laser cutting head comprising such a nozzle and/or such an arrangement, method for plasma cutting, method for laser cutting and method for plasma laser cutting using the same.