Plastic Battery Cover Ribs for Crash Load Transfer

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing battery cover elements made of sheet metal lack the ability to create complex three-dimensional geometries for optimal support and force transmission during a crash event, leading to high costs and limited effectiveness.

Innovation Solution

A battery arrangement with a cover element made of plastic, featuring rib-like support portions that rest on cooling plates and longitudinal members, allowing for improved rigidity and force transmission through a form-fitting design.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If sheet metal is used for the cover element, then the material strength is sufficient, but the ability to create complex three-dimensional geometries for optimal support and force transmission is limited and costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecover element strengthVSAvoidmanufacturing complexity and cost
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the material parameter from sheet metal to thermoplastic material, enabling complex three-dimensional geometries to be manufactured cost-effectively through injection molding while maintaining sufficient strength for crash events

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses fiber-reinforced thermoplastic composite material that combines the strength characteristics of traditional metal materials with the manufacturing advantages of plastic materials, allowing complex geometries to be formed integrally

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

2Adaptability or versatility

If sheet metal is used for the cover element, then the material is readily available, but complex three-dimensional geometries for optimal support require very complex manufacturing processes

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegeometric complexityVSAvoidmanufacturing process complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Changing from metal to thermoplastic material enables complex geometries to be manufactured through simple injection molding processes, reducing manufacturing complexity while increasing geometric adaptability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent merges multiple functions (support portions, carrying portions, integration features) into a single integrally molded cover element, simplifying the manufacturing process while achieving complex three-dimensional geometries

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Data Source

PatentUS20250329855A1Battery arrangement with a cover element made of plastic and having rib-like supporting portions, and motor vehicle with such a battery arrangement
Publication Date: 2025.10.23 AUDI AG
  • US20250329855A1 patent drawing
  • US20250329855A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A battery arrangement for an at least partially electrically powered motor vehicle, including a battery box; a plurality of battery modules arranged next to one another in the battery box; a cooling plate arranged on a respective battery module with at least one coolant channel; a cover element made of a plastic material, which is arranged on the battery box so that the battery modules and the cooling plates are covered. The cover element has rib-like support portions facing the battery modules, which support the cover element on the cooling plates.