Strapped Plastic Container Base for Bending and Leaning Resistance

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Plastic containers face challenges in maintaining structural integrity under stress and deformation, particularly during shipping and handling, especially when auxiliary packaging is removed, and they need to resist bending, leaning, and stretching while minimizing material usage.

Innovation Solution

The design incorporates varying depth ribs and a strap base rib to distribute forces, providing resistance to bending, leaning, and stretching, while maintaining hoop strength and reducing material usage.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Weight of moving object

If plastic container wall thickness is reduced to decrease weight, then transportation and manufacturing costs are reduced, but structural integrity and resistance to deformation under stress worsen

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontainer weightVSAvoidstructural integrity
Core Design Contradiction:
Weight of moving objectVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The base is divided into multiple functional zones including footed portions, strap ribs, and load-bearing ribs that segment the structural support functions. This segmentation allows each zone to specialize in specific stress resistance while using minimal material overall.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different regions of the base have different thicknesses and structural properties - footed portions have concentrated material for point load resistance, while strap ribs provide tensile strength in specific directions. This local quality optimization reduces overall material usage while maintaining strength where needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Loss of substance

If auxiliary packaging is removed to reduce packaging material usage, then packaging costs are reduced, but stress and deformation resistance of the container worsens

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepackaging material usageVSAvoidcontainer stability during shipping
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of substanceVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The container base is pre-designed with integrated strengthening features including strap ribs and footed portions that proactively prepare the structure to withstand shipping stresses without requiring external packaging support.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The container base serves its own support function through self-contained structural features like the strap ribs and load-bearing ribs, eliminating the need for external paperboard or film packaging for structural support during transportation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Quantity of substance

If base material is reduced to achieve lightweight construction, then manufacturing costs are reduced, but resistance to bending and point loading failures worsens

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebase material quantityVSAvoidresistance to bending and point loading
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The footed portions and strap ribs incorporate curved and domed geometries that naturally distribute point loads across broader areas. The curved surfaces of the footed portions convert concentrated point loads into distributed radial stresses, reducing bending moments.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #14Spheroidality (Curvature)

Solution Approach 2:

The base combines different polymer materials or material densities in different zones - potentially using reinforced materials in high-stress strap rib areas and lighter materials in less critical regions, creating a composite structure that optimizes strength-to-weight ratio.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The design effectively resists deformation and maintains structural integrity under pressure and handling conditions, allowing for lightweight construction without compromising mechanical performance.

Implementation Method 1

the strap ribs and recessed columns distribute bending and top load forces along the wall to resist deformation

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectForce distribution: Force

Implementation Method 2

the bottle can be pressurized to help the bottle retain its shape. As another example, the bottle can be pressurized with certain gases to help preserve a beverage contained in the bottle

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPressurization: Pressurisation

Implementation Method 3

PET and other resins tend to relax at temperatures normally seen during use. This relaxation is a time dependent stress relieving response to strain

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectViscoelasticity: Viscoelasticity

Implementation Method 4

An example of the small scale is the flexing or folding of ribs or other small features on the wall of the bottle. When they are held in this position with time, the ribs will permanently deform through relaxation

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElastic deformation: Elasticity

Data Source

PatentUS12466602B2Plastic container with strapped base
Publication Date: 2025.11.11 NIAGARA BOTTLING LLC
  • US12466602B2 patent drawing
  • US12466602B2 patent drawing
  • US12466602B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A container may have a base, a sidewall connected to the base, a bell connected to the sidewall, and a finish connected to the bell. The base may have strap ribs to resist deformation of the base. The sidewall may have recessed columns to resist bending, leaning, crumbling, and/or stretching. The strap ribs and recessed columns may vertically line up along a central axis of the container to communicate forces on the container vertically along the container to continuously resist deformation in the base and the sidewall.