Plastic Cover Locking Mechanism for Vial Stopper Protection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing closure devices for medication containers, such as glass vials, face contamination risks due to the time gap between installing the elastomer stopper and the metal capsule, which can lead to exposure to non-sterile environments, and the reliance on elasticity for sealing, which is not always effective.

Innovation Solution

A closure device featuring a plastics material cover with a ring and drive member that locks onto the container's neck, allowing for easy and secure mounting with arbitrary angular orientation, providing immediate protection to the elastomer stopper and eliminating the need for elasticity-based sealing.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a metal capsule is used to seal the vial, then hermetic sealing is achieved, but glass particles may detach and pollute the content

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehermetic sealingVSAvoidglass particle contamination
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The invention extracts the sealing function from the metal capsule and transfers it to the elastomer stopper. The stopper is designed to provide hermetic sealing against gas, liquids, and bacteria, while the metal capsule is eliminated, thereby removing the source of glass particle contamination.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The invention changes the material parameter of the sealing element from metal (capsule) to elastomer (stopper). This material substitution maintains the hermetic sealing function while eliminating the harmful interaction between metal crimping and glass particles.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Productivity

If the capsule is crimped onto the vial after a time interval following stopper installation, then the filling or freeze-drying process is completed, but the content is exposed to contamination risks

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefilling and freeze-drying cycleVSAvoidcontent contamination
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The invention applies preliminary action by installing the protective cover immediately after stopper placement, before the filling or freeze-drying process begins. This creates a sealed environment from the outset, preventing contamination during the entire production cycle.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The protective cover acts as an intermediary element between the stopper and the external environment. It provides immediate protection to the content during the filling and freeze-drying processes, eliminating the contamination risk associated with delayed sealing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Reliability

If a plastics material cover with ring and drive member is used, then immediate protection and easy mounting are achieved, but the device structure becomes more complex

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimmediate protectionVSAvoidcover structure
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The protective cover is segmented into distinct functional components: a ring portion for mounting on the vial neck, a drive member for actuating the locking mechanism, and a cover portion for protecting the stopper. This segmentation allows each component to perform its specific function efficiently while simplifying the overall assembly process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The drive member incorporates dynamic elements such as spring-loaded locking tabs that automatically engage with the ring. This dynamic design enables automatic locking upon mounting, providing immediate protection without requiring complex manual assembly steps.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

4Ease of operation

If an elasticity-based locking mechanism is used, then the outer cover can lock the inner cover, but the locking is not always effective

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelocking mechanismVSAvoidlocking effectiveness
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The locking mechanism is designed to be self-actuating through the drive member. When the cover is mounted on the vial, the drive member automatically engages the locking tabs with the ring, providing reliable locking without requiring additional manual intervention or complex elastic deformation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS8225949B2Plug device for a container and container provided with one such device
Publication Date: 2012.07.24 WEST PHARMA SERVICES DEUT GMBH & CO KG
  • US8225949B2 patent drawing
  • US8225949B2 patent drawing
  • US8225949B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The closure device (500) comprises a stopper (501) made of elastomer and a cover (502) suitable for covering both the neck (12) of a container and stopper (501) in place in said neck (12). The cover (502) is made of plastics material and comprises a ring (503) and a drive member (504). The ring (503) may surround the stopper (501) and the neck (12) in the mounted configuration, the ring being provided with locking means (503G) for locking on the neck (12). The drive member (504) may be mounted on the ring (503) in arbitrary angular orientation about a central axis (X503) of the ring. The drive member is provided with an annular edge (505D) suitable for being engaged between an outer skirt (503A) of the ring (503) and at least one tab (503G) forming locking means and extending radially towards the central axis (X503) of the ring from the skirt (503A).