Plastic Particle Feeding Weight Control With Dynamic Motor Feedback

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for controlling the feeding weight of plastic particles in plastic product production face challenges such as low precision, inertia effects leading to weight deviations, and inefficient feeding due to fixed motor shutdown times, which are not adaptable to varying material characteristics.

Innovation Solution

A control method utilizing a speed regulating motor with weight feedback, where a central processor and motor controller work together to adjust dosing speed in multiple stages, incorporating real-time weight feedback and automatic correction of advance quantities to improve precision and efficiency.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If weighing type feeding control is used to improve weight control accuracy, then manufacturing precision is improved, but the motor speed cannot be adjusted and inertia effects cause weight deviations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveweight control accuracyVSAvoidmotor speed adjustment capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies dynamics by transitioning from fixed motor speed to dynamic speed regulation. The motor controller adjusts motor speed in real-time based on feedback from the weighing module, enabling the system to adapt to different material characteristics and control requirements while maintaining accurate weight control throughout the feeding process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the parameter of motor speed from a fixed value to a dynamically adjustable parameter. By modifying the motor speed parameter during operation based on weight feedback and material characteristics, the system achieves both accurate weight control and adaptability to different feeding conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Productivity

If motor speed is increased to reduce feeding time, then productivity is improved, but inertia effects cause actual weight to exceed set weight

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefeeding speedVSAvoidweight accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements feedback control where the weighing module continuously monitors the weight of plastic particles and feeds this information back to the motor controller. The controller uses this feedback to dynamically adjust motor speed, reducing speed when approaching the target weight to minimize inertia effects and ensure accurate weight control while maintaining high productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary action by predicting the remaining weight needed and pre-adjusting motor speed before the motor stops. This allows the system to account for inertia effects in advance by reducing speed appropriately before the feeding cycle ends, ensuring accurate weight control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Manufacturing precision

If motor shutdown time is extended to account for material travel distance, then manufacturing precision is improved, but output is reduced due to longer cycle time

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebatch weight precisionVSAvoidfeeding output
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies dynamics by replacing fixed shutdown timing with dynamic speed adjustment. Instead of extending the shutdown period, the system dynamically reduces motor speed as the target weight approaches, allowing material to continue feeding at reduced rate while maintaining precision and avoiding extended cycle times that would reduce productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

4Ease of operation

If fixed advance shutdown time is used to control motor stopping, then ease of operation is improved, but manufacturing precision deteriorates due to variable material weight

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol simplicityVSAvoidsingle component blanking weight
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements feedback control where the weighing module provides real-time weight information to the motor controller. This automatic feedback mechanism replaces manual fixed timing with intelligent dynamic control, maintaining ease of operation through automated control while achieving high manufacturing precision by continuously adjusting motor speed based on actual weight measurements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This method achieves high precision in batch weight control, reduces inertia-related weight deviations, and ensures efficient feeding by dynamically adjusting motor speed and correcting advance quantities in real-time, thus improving overall control accuracy and output stability.

Implementation Method 1

When the motor is shut down, due to the effect of inertia, if the speed is too high, the actual weight will easily exceed the set weight

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectInertia: Inertia

Implementation Method 2

The weighing module collects the weight of the plastic particles in the container and feeds it back to the control controller

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectWeight feedback: Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS20250165014A1Control method of feeding weight of plastic particles based on speed regulating motor and weight feedback
Publication Date: 2025.05.22 MOTAN HLDG
  • US20250165014A1 patent drawing
  • US20250165014A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A control method of feeding weight of plastic particles based on speed regulating motor and weight feedback is characterized in that it includes a central processor (71), which is electrically connected to a motor controller (72), and the motor controller (72) drives a actuator (73) to drive a controlled object (74) to complete an operation, so that a mixing bin (4) outputs the corresponding amount of materials, and characterized in that a detection device (75) is set on the controlled object (74), and the detection device (75) is communicated with the central processor (71).